head to head · open source
copyparty vs psitransfer
copyparty has 47,364 GitHub stars, 1,926 forks, 252 open issues and last shipped 25 days ago. psitransfer has 1,975 stars, 248 forks, 109 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. copyparty leads on adoption by 2,298% (47,364 vs 1,975 stars). copyparty is written in Python under MIT; psitransfer is written in JavaScript under BSD-2-Clause. copyparty has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, psitransfer 13%. psitransfer was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (file-sharing), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| copyparty | psitransfer | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 47K | ★ 2.0K |
| License | MIT | BSD-2-Clause |
| Written in | Python | JavaScript |
| Last push | 2026-10-21 | 2026-11-10 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.9K | ⑂ 248 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick copyparty if
- You weight community size — 47K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick psitransfer if
- You want the psitransfer feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the BSD-2-Clause license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You evaluated both and psitransfer fits your workflow better
About copyparty
💾🎉 copyparty turn almost any device into a file server with resumable uploads/downloads using any web browser server only needs Python (2 or 3), all dependencies optional 🔌 protocols: http(s) // webdav // sftp // ftp(s) // tftp // smb/cifs 📱 android app // iPhone shortcuts 👉 Get started! or visit the read only demo server 👀 running on a nuc in my basement 📷 screenshots: browser // upload // unpost // thumbnails // search // fsearch // zip DL // md viewer 🎬 videos: upload // cli upload // race the beam // 👉 feature showcase (youtube) built in Norway 🇳🇴 with contributions from not norway readme toc top…
read the full copyparty overview →
About psitransfer
PsiTransfer Simple open source self hosted file sharing solution. It's an alternative to paid services like Dropbox, WeTransfer. No accounts, no logins Mobile friendly responsive interface Supports many and very big files (Streams ftw) Resumable up and downloads (tus.io) Set an expire time for your upload bucket One time downloads Download all files as zip/tar.gz archive Modal style file preview Requires Node =7.4 or use harmony async await flag Password protected download list (AES) /admin Page lists bucket information, Screenshot ( disabled until you set adminPass config value ) Lightweight Vue based frontend…
read the full psitransfer overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More File Management & Sync projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.
Frequently asked questions
Is copyparty or psitransfer more popular?
copyparty has 47,364 GitHub stars and psitransfer has 1,975. copyparty has the larger community by that measure.
Are copyparty and psitransfer free?
Both are open source. copyparty is licensed under MIT and psitransfer under BSD-2-Clause. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between copyparty and psitransfer?
copyparty is written in Python and psitransfer in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, copyparty or psitransfer?
Choose copyparty if you want the larger community (47,364 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose psitransfer if its feature set, stack or BSD-2-Clause licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.