head to head · open source
copyparty vs Palmr
copyparty has 47,336 GitHub stars, 1,923 forks, 252 open issues and last shipped 23 days ago. Palmr has 2,396 stars, 107 forks, 1 open issues and last shipped 28 days ago. copyparty leads on adoption by 1,876% (47,336 vs 2,396 stars). copyparty is written in Python under MIT; Palmr is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0. copyparty has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, Palmr 4%. copyparty was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (file-sharing), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| copyparty | Palmr | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 47K | ★ 2.4K |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | Python | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-10-21 | 2026-10-16 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.9K | ⑂ 107 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick copyparty if
- You weight community size — 47K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Palmr if
- You want the Palmr feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and Palmr fits your workflow better
About copyparty
💾🎉 copyparty turn almost any device into a file server with resumable uploads/downloads using any web browser server only needs Python (2 or 3), all dependencies optional 🔌 protocols: http(s) // webdav // sftp // ftp(s) // tftp // smb/cifs 📱 android app // iPhone shortcuts 👉 Get started! or visit the read only demo server 👀 running on a nuc in my basement 📷 screenshots: browser // upload // unpost // thumbnails // search // fsearch // zip DL // md viewer 🎬 videos: upload // cli upload // race the beam // 👉 feature showcase (youtube) built in Norway 🇳🇴 with contributions from not norway readme toc top…
read the full copyparty overview →
About Palmr
⚠️ Project Archived After deep reflection, I have decided to focus my limited time and energy on my other projects. As a solo developer, I have struggled to actively maintain multiple projects with the care and attention they deserve. Without enough sponsors, it became unfeasible to maintain Palmr. If you are interested in continuing this work through a fork, I will be happy to add a link to it here in the README. We thank all the contributors and users who have supported Palmr over time! 🌴 Palmr. Open Source File Transfer Palmr. is a flexible and open source alternative to file transfer services like…
read the full Palmr overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More File Management & Sync projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.
Frequently asked questions
Is copyparty or Palmr more popular?
copyparty has 47,336 GitHub stars and Palmr has 2,396. copyparty has the larger community by that measure.
Are copyparty and Palmr free?
Both are open source. copyparty is licensed under MIT and Palmr under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between copyparty and Palmr?
copyparty is written in Python and Palmr in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, copyparty or Palmr?
Choose copyparty if you want the larger community (47,336 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Palmr if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.