head to head · open source
copyparty vs nimble-commander
copyparty has 47,031 GitHub stars, 1,905 forks, 252 open issues and last shipped yesterday. nimble-commander has 746 stars, 57 forks, 34 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. copyparty leads on adoption by 6,204% (47,031 vs 746 stars). copyparty is written in Python under MIT; nimble-commander is written in C++ under GPL-3.0. copyparty has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, nimble-commander 8%. copyparty was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| copyparty | nimble-commander | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 47K | ★ 746 |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Written in | Python | C++ |
| Last push | 2026-10-14 | 2026-10-11 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.9K | ⑂ 57 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick copyparty if
- You weight community size — 47K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick nimble-commander if
- You want the nimble-commander feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches C++
- You evaluated both and nimble-commander fits your workflow better
About copyparty
copyparty is a portable file server that turns almost any device into a file server with resumable uploads and downloads through any web browser, built for self hosters, homelab operators, NAS owners and anyone who wants to share files directly from their own hardware.
read the full copyparty overview →
About nimble-commander
Nimble Commander is a free, open source, dual pane file manager for macOS, aimed at Mac users who want keyboard driven navigation and the speed of classic file managers instead of the pointer first workflow of the Finder.
read the full nimble-commander overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More File Management & Sync projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.
Frequently asked questions
Is copyparty or nimble-commander more popular?
copyparty has 47,031 GitHub stars and nimble-commander has 746. copyparty has the larger community by that measure.
Are copyparty and nimble-commander free?
Both are open source. copyparty is licensed under MIT and nimble-commander under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between copyparty and nimble-commander?
copyparty is written in Python and nimble-commander in C++. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, copyparty or nimble-commander?
Choose copyparty if you want the larger community (47,031 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose nimble-commander if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.