head to head · open source
copyparty vs MaterialFiles
copyparty has 47,257 GitHub stars, 1,920 forks, 252 open issues and last shipped 16 days ago. MaterialFiles has 9,404 stars, 786 forks, 611 open issues and last shipped 22 days ago. copyparty leads on adoption by 403% (47,257 vs 9,404 stars). copyparty is written in Python under MIT; MaterialFiles is written in Kotlin under GPL-3.0. copyparty has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, MaterialFiles 8%. copyparty was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| copyparty | MaterialFiles | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 47K | ★ 9.4K |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Written in | Python | Kotlin |
| Last push | 2026-10-21 | 2026-10-15 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.9K | ⑂ 786 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick copyparty if
- You weight community size — 47K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick MaterialFiles if
- You want the MaterialFiles feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Kotlin
- You evaluated both and MaterialFiles fits your workflow better
About copyparty
💾🎉 copyparty turn almost any device into a file server with resumable uploads/downloads using any web browser server only needs Python (2 or 3), all dependencies optional 🔌 protocols: http(s) // webdav // sftp // ftp(s) // tftp // smb/cifs 📱 android app // iPhone shortcuts 👉 Get started! or visit the read only demo server 👀 running on a nuc in my basement 📷 screenshots: browser // upload // unpost // thumbnails // search // fsearch // zip DL // md viewer 🎬 videos: upload // cli upload // race the beam // 👉 feature showcase (youtube) built in Norway 🇳🇴 with contributions from not norway readme toc top…
read the full copyparty overview →
About MaterialFiles
Material Files 本文中文版 An open source Material Design file manager, for Android 5.0+. Help translation on Transifex (Search Android & GNOME translations, Microsoft language resources, MIME type translations) Preview Features Open source: Lightweight, clean and secure. Material Design: Follows Material Design guidelines, with attention into details. Breadcrumbs: Navigate in the filesystem with ease. Root support: View and manage files with root access. Archive support: View, extract and create common compressed files. NAS support: View and manage files on FTP, SFTP, SMB and WebDAV servers. Themes: Customizable UI…
read the full MaterialFiles overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More File Management & Sync projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.
Frequently asked questions
Is copyparty or MaterialFiles more popular?
copyparty has 47,257 GitHub stars and MaterialFiles has 9,404. copyparty has the larger community by that measure.
Are copyparty and MaterialFiles free?
Both are open source. copyparty is licensed under MIT and MaterialFiles under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between copyparty and MaterialFiles?
copyparty is written in Python and MaterialFiles in Kotlin. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, copyparty or MaterialFiles?
Choose copyparty if you want the larger community (47,257 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose MaterialFiles if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.