head to head · open source
copyparty vs joshuto
copyparty has 47,328 GitHub stars, 1,924 forks, 252 open issues and last shipped 22 days ago. joshuto has 3,744 stars, 164 forks, 102 open issues and last shipped 17 days ago. copyparty leads on adoption by 1,164% (47,328 vs 3,744 stars). copyparty is written in Python under MIT; joshuto is written in Rust under LGPL-3.0. copyparty has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, joshuto 4%. joshuto was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| copyparty | joshuto | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 47K | ★ 3.7K |
| License | MIT | LGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | Python | Rust |
| Last push | 2026-10-21 | 2026-10-26 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.9K | ⑂ 164 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick copyparty if
- You weight community size — 47K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick joshuto if
- You want the joshuto feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the LGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Rust
- You evaluated both and joshuto fits your workflow better
About copyparty
💾🎉 copyparty turn almost any device into a file server with resumable uploads/downloads using any web browser server only needs Python (2 or 3), all dependencies optional 🔌 protocols: http(s) // webdav // sftp // ftp(s) // tftp // smb/cifs 📱 android app // iPhone shortcuts 👉 Get started! or visit the read only demo server 👀 running on a nuc in my basement 📷 screenshots: browser // upload // unpost // thumbnails // search // fsearch // zip DL // md viewer 🎬 videos: upload // cli upload // race the beam // 👉 feature showcase (youtube) built in Norway 🇳🇴 with contributions from not norway readme toc top…
read the full copyparty overview →
About joshuto
joshuto ranger like terminal file manager written in Rust. Dependencies cargo = 1.90 rustc = 1.90 xsel/xclip/wl clipboard (optional, for clipboard support) fzf (optional) zoxide (optional) Also see Cargo.toml Building Installation For single user For single user with cargo System wide From pre compiled binary Dependencies: curl openssl Latest release Installs the latest version using the default installation path ( $HOME/.local/bin/ ). nix { description = "My configuration"; inputs = { nixpkgs.url = "github:NixOS/nixpkgs/nixos unstable"; joshuto.url = "github:kamiyaa/joshuto"; }; outputs = { nixpkgs, joshuto…
read the full joshuto overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More File Management & Sync projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.
Frequently asked questions
Is copyparty or joshuto more popular?
copyparty has 47,328 GitHub stars and joshuto has 3,744. copyparty has the larger community by that measure.
Are copyparty and joshuto free?
Both are open source. copyparty is licensed under MIT and joshuto under LGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between copyparty and joshuto?
copyparty is written in Python and joshuto in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, copyparty or joshuto?
Choose copyparty if you want the larger community (47,328 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose joshuto if its feature set, stack or LGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.