head to head · open source
copyparty vs Hoodik
copyparty has 47,252 GitHub stars, 1,921 forks, 252 open issues and last shipped 14 days ago. Hoodik has 1,547 stars, 74 forks, 11 open issues and last shipped yesterday. copyparty leads on adoption by 2,954% (47,252 vs 1,547 stars). copyparty is written in Python under MIT; Hoodik is written in Rust under a custom or non-standard licence. copyparty has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, Hoodik 5%. Hoodik was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| copyparty | Hoodik | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 47K | ★ 1.5K |
| License | MIT | Custom / other |
| Written in | Python | Rust |
| Last push | 2026-10-21 | 2026-11-03 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.9K | ⑂ 74 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick copyparty if
- You weight community size — 47K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Hoodik if
- You want the Hoodik feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches Rust
- You evaluated both and Hoodik fits your workflow better
About copyparty
💾🎉 copyparty turn almost any device into a file server with resumable uploads/downloads using any web browser server only needs Python (2 or 3), all dependencies optional 🔌 protocols: http(s) // webdav // sftp // ftp(s) // tftp // smb/cifs 📱 android app // iPhone shortcuts 👉 Get started! or visit the read only demo server 👀 running on a nuc in my basement 📷 screenshots: browser // upload // unpost // thumbnails // search // fsearch // zip DL // md viewer 🎬 videos: upload // cli upload // race the beam // 👉 feature showcase (youtube) built in Norway 🇳🇴 with contributions from not norway readme toc top…
read the full copyparty overview →
About Hoodik
Hoodik Hoodik is a lightweight, self hosted, end to end encrypted cloud storage server. All encryption and decryption happens in your browser — the server never sees your plaintext data. Built with Rust (Actix web) on the backend and Vue 3 on the frontend. 🌐 hoodik.io — Website ☁️ Hoodik Cloud 📱 Android App 🍎 iOS & macOS App ⚡ Self Hosting Guide Features End to end encryption — files are encrypted in the browser with AEGIS 128L before upload and decrypted after download; file keys are wrapped with a quantum resistant X25519 + ML KEM 768 hybrid (RSA on legacy accounts) Secure search — file metadata is…
read the full Hoodik overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More File Management & Sync projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.
Frequently asked questions
Is copyparty or Hoodik more popular?
copyparty has 47,252 GitHub stars and Hoodik has 1,547. copyparty has the larger community by that measure.
Are copyparty and Hoodik free?
Both are open source. copyparty is licensed under MIT, and Hoodik has no licence declared in this registry. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between copyparty and Hoodik?
copyparty is written in Python and Hoodik in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, copyparty or Hoodik?
Choose copyparty if you want the larger community (47,252 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Hoodik if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.