head to head · open source
copyparty vs Firefiles
copyparty has 47,252 GitHub stars, 1,921 forks, 252 open issues and last shipped 15 days ago. Firefiles has 370 stars, 59 forks, 14 open issues and last shipped 1.0 years ago. copyparty leads on adoption by 12,671% (47,252 vs 370 stars). copyparty is written in Python under MIT; Firefiles is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0. copyparty has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, Firefiles 16%. copyparty was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| copyparty | Firefiles | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 47K | ★ 370 |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | Python | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-10-21 | 2025-11-03 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.9K | ⑂ 59 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick copyparty if
- You weight community size — 47K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Firefiles if
- You want the Firefiles feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and Firefiles fits your workflow better
About copyparty
💾🎉 copyparty turn almost any device into a file server with resumable uploads/downloads using any web browser server only needs Python (2 or 3), all dependencies optional 🔌 protocols: http(s) // webdav // sftp // ftp(s) // tftp // smb/cifs 📱 android app // iPhone shortcuts 👉 Get started! or visit the read only demo server 👀 running on a nuc in my basement 📷 screenshots: browser // upload // unpost // thumbnails // search // fsearch // zip DL // md viewer 🎬 videos: upload // cli upload // race the beam // 👉 feature showcase (youtube) built in Norway 🇳🇴 with contributions from not norway readme toc top…
read the full copyparty overview →
About Firefiles
Firefiles Join Discord: Description Firefiles is an open‑source alternative to Dropbox which lets you setup a cloud drive with the backend of your choice and lets you seamlessly manage your files across multiple providers. Features A modern file system interface for your storage buckets. Manage files in the browser. Easily download and share files. File previews. File tagging and filtering (if provider supports). AWS S3 support. Dark theme. Screenshots Tech Used Sponsor this project Firefiles is an open source project. If you want to support the project, you can do so by funding / sponsoring the project. Here…
read the full Firefiles overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More File Management & Sync projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.
Frequently asked questions
Is copyparty or Firefiles more popular?
copyparty has 47,252 GitHub stars and Firefiles has 370. copyparty has the larger community by that measure.
Are copyparty and Firefiles free?
Both are open source. copyparty is licensed under MIT and Firefiles under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between copyparty and Firefiles?
copyparty is written in Python and Firefiles in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, copyparty or Firefiles?
Choose copyparty if you want the larger community (47,252 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Firefiles if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.