head to head · open source
copyparty vs Firefiles
copyparty has 46,739 GitHub stars, 1,905 forks, 252 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Firefiles has 371 stars, 57 forks, 14 open issues and last shipped 11 months ago. copyparty leads on adoption by 12,498% (46,739 vs 371 stars). copyparty is written in Python under MIT; Firefiles is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0. copyparty has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, Firefiles 15%. copyparty was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| copyparty | Firefiles | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 47K | ★ 371 |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | Python | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-09-19 | 2025-11-03 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.9K | ⑂ 57 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick copyparty if
- You weight community size — 47K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Firefiles if
- You want the Firefiles feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and Firefiles fits your workflow better
About copyparty
copyparty is a portable file server that turns almost any device into a file server with resumable uploads and downloads through any web browser, built for self hosters, homelab operators, NAS owners and anyone who wants to share files directly from their own hardware.
read the full copyparty overview →
About Firefiles
Firefiles is an open source, self hosted alternative to Dropbox: a TypeScript and Next.js web application that turns your own cloud storage buckets — such as AWS S3, Backblaze, or Firebase Cloud Storage — into a single browser based drive with a familiar file system interface, built for people who want Dropbox style file management while keeping their files in storage they already own.
read the full Firefiles overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More File Management & Sync projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.
Frequently asked questions
Is copyparty or Firefiles more popular?
copyparty has 46,739 GitHub stars and Firefiles has 371. copyparty has the larger community by that measure.
Are copyparty and Firefiles free?
Both are open source. copyparty is licensed under MIT and Firefiles under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between copyparty and Firefiles?
copyparty is written in Python and Firefiles in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, copyparty or Firefiles?
Choose copyparty if you want the larger community (46,739 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Firefiles if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.