head to head · open source

copyparty vs cryptgeon

copyparty has 46,855 GitHub stars, 1,904 forks, 252 open issues and last shipped yesterday. cryptgeon has 1,543 stars, 161 forks, 15 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. copyparty leads on adoption by 2,937% (46,855 vs 1,543 stars). copyparty is written in Python under MIT; cryptgeon is written in Svelte under MIT. copyparty has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, cryptgeon 10%. copyparty was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (file-sharing), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

copyparty ★ 47K cryptgeon ★ 1.5K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

copyparty cryptgeon
GitHub stars ★ 47K ★ 1.5K
License MIT MIT
Written in Python Svelte
Last push 2026-09-30 2026-09-26
Forks ⑂ 1.9K ⑂ 161
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick copyparty if

  • You weight community size — 47K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full copyparty profile →

pick cryptgeon if

  • You want the cryptgeon feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Svelte
  • You evaluated both and cryptgeon fits your workflow better

full cryptgeon profile →

About copyparty

copyparty is a portable file server that turns almost any device into a file server with resumable uploads and downloads through any web browser, built for self hosters, homelab operators, NAS owners and anyone who wants to share files directly from their own hardware.

read the full copyparty overview →

About cryptgeon

cryptgeon is a secure, open source note and file sharing service inspired by PrivNote, written in Rust and Svelte, for anyone who wants to send self destructing secrets without trusting the server with the plaintext.

read the full cryptgeon overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 206K Excalidraw ★ 133K RustDesk ★ 125K LocalSend ★ 93K AppFlowy ★ 77K OBS Studio ★ 77K

Related comparisons

localsend vs copyparty localsend vs rclone localsend vs files localsend vs yazi localsend vs spacedrive localsend vs nextcloud localsend vs uppy localsend vs cloudreve openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces

More File Management & Sync projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.

copyparty vs LocalSend copyparty vs rclone copyparty vs Files copyparty vs yazi copyparty vs Spacedrive copyparty vs Nextcloud copyparty vs uppy copyparty vs cloudreve copyparty vs superfile copyparty vs ranger copyparty vs Seafile copyparty vs PairDrop

Frequently asked questions

Is copyparty or cryptgeon more popular?

copyparty has 46,855 GitHub stars and cryptgeon has 1,543. copyparty has the larger community by that measure.

Are copyparty and cryptgeon free?

Both are open source. copyparty is licensed under MIT and cryptgeon under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between copyparty and cryptgeon?

copyparty is written in Python and cryptgeon in Svelte. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, copyparty or cryptgeon?

Choose copyparty if you want the larger community (46,855 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose cryptgeon if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.