head to head · open source
copyparty vs cryptgeon
copyparty has 47,364 GitHub stars, 1,926 forks, 252 open issues and last shipped 25 days ago. cryptgeon has 1,578 stars, 167 forks, 15 open issues and last shipped 26 days ago. copyparty leads on adoption by 2,902% (47,364 vs 1,578 stars). copyparty is written in Python under MIT; cryptgeon is written in Svelte under MIT. copyparty has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, cryptgeon 11%. copyparty was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (file-sharing), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| copyparty | cryptgeon | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 47K | ★ 1.6K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Python | Svelte |
| Last push | 2026-10-21 | 2026-10-20 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.9K | ⑂ 167 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick copyparty if
- You weight community size — 47K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick cryptgeon if
- You want the cryptgeon feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Svelte
- You evaluated both and cryptgeon fits your workflow better
About copyparty
💾🎉 copyparty turn almost any device into a file server with resumable uploads/downloads using any web browser server only needs Python (2 or 3), all dependencies optional 🔌 protocols: http(s) // webdav // sftp // ftp(s) // tftp // smb/cifs 📱 android app // iPhone shortcuts 👉 Get started! or visit the read only demo server 👀 running on a nuc in my basement 📷 screenshots: browser // upload // unpost // thumbnails // search // fsearch // zip DL // md viewer 🎬 videos: upload // cli upload // race the beam // 👉 feature showcase (youtube) built in Norway 🇳🇴 with contributions from not norway readme toc top…
read the full copyparty overview →
About cryptgeon
EN 简体中文 ES About? cryptgeon is a secure, open source sharing note or file service inspired by PrivNote . It includes a server, a web page and a CLI client. 🌍 If you want to translate the project feel free to reach out to me. Live Service / Demo Web Check out the live service / demo and see for yourself cryptgeon.org CLI For more documentation about the CLI see the readme. Raycast Extension There is an official Raycast extension. Features send text or files server cannot decrypt contents due to client side encryption view or time constraints in memory, no persistence obligatory dark mode support How does it…
read the full cryptgeon overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More File Management & Sync projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.
Frequently asked questions
Is copyparty or cryptgeon more popular?
copyparty has 47,364 GitHub stars and cryptgeon has 1,578. copyparty has the larger community by that measure.
Are copyparty and cryptgeon free?
Both are open source. copyparty is licensed under MIT and cryptgeon under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between copyparty and cryptgeon?
copyparty is written in Python and cryptgeon in Svelte. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, copyparty or cryptgeon?
Choose copyparty if you want the larger community (47,364 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose cryptgeon if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.