head to head · open source

copyparty vs chadtree

copyparty has 46,916 GitHub stars, 1,904 forks, 252 open issues and last shipped yesterday. chadtree has 1,688 stars, 62 forks, 93 open issues and last shipped yesterday. copyparty leads on adoption by 2,679% (46,916 vs 1,688 stars). copyparty is written in Python under MIT; chadtree is written in Python under GPL-3.0. copyparty has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, chadtree 4%. chadtree was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

copyparty ★ 47K chadtree ★ 1.7K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

copyparty chadtree
GitHub stars ★ 47K ★ 1.7K
License MIT GPL-3.0
Written in Python Python
Last push 2026-10-06 2026-10-06
Forks ⑂ 1.9K ⑂ 62
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick copyparty if

  • You weight community size — 47K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full copyparty profile →

pick chadtree if

  • You want the chadtree feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and chadtree fits your workflow better

full chadtree profile →

About copyparty

copyparty is a portable file server that turns almost any device into a file server with resumable uploads and downloads through any web browser, built for self hosters, homelab operators, NAS owners and anyone who wants to share files directly from their own hardware.

read the full copyparty overview →

About chadtree

CHADTree is a file manager plugin for Neovim, written in Python, aimed at developers who want a fast, feature rich tree explorer as an alternative to NERDTree.

read the full chadtree overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 207K Excalidraw ★ 134K RustDesk ★ 125K LocalSend ★ 94K AppFlowy ★ 77K OBS Studio ★ 77K

Related comparisons

localsend vs copyparty localsend vs rclone localsend vs files localsend vs yazi localsend vs spacedrive localsend vs nextcloud localsend vs uppy localsend vs cloudreve openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces

More File Management & Sync projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.

copyparty vs LocalSend copyparty vs rclone copyparty vs Files copyparty vs yazi copyparty vs Spacedrive copyparty vs Nextcloud copyparty vs uppy copyparty vs cloudreve copyparty vs superfile copyparty vs ranger copyparty vs Seafile copyparty vs PairDrop

Frequently asked questions

Is copyparty or chadtree more popular?

copyparty has 46,916 GitHub stars and chadtree has 1,688. copyparty has the larger community by that measure.

Are copyparty and chadtree free?

Both are open source. copyparty is licensed under MIT and chadtree under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between copyparty and chadtree?

copyparty is written in Python and chadtree in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, copyparty or chadtree?

Choose copyparty if you want the larger community (46,916 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose chadtree if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.