head to head · open source

codegraph vs Omnigent

codegraph has 71,514 GitHub stars, 4,598 forks, 526 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. Omnigent has 10,106 stars, 1,601 forks, 1,315 open issues and last shipped today. codegraph leads on adoption by 608% (71,514 vs 10,106 stars). codegraph is written in C under MIT; Omnigent is written in Python under Apache-2.0. codegraph has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, Omnigent 16%. Omnigent was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

codegraph ★ 72K Omnigent ★ 10K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

codegraph Omnigent
GitHub stars ★ 72K ★ 10K
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in C Python
Last push 2026-09-16 2026-09-20
Forks ⑂ 4.6K ⑂ 1.6K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick codegraph if

  • You weight community size — 72K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches C
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full codegraph profile →

pick Omnigent if

  • You want the Omnigent feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and Omnigent fits your workflow better

full Omnigent profile →

About codegraph

CodeGraph is a pre indexed code knowledge graph that runs locally and wires into AI coding agents — Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, Gemini, OpenCode, AntiGravity, Kiro, GitHub Copilot, and Hermes Agent — so those agents query a semantic map of the codebase instead of reading files one at a time.

read the full codegraph overview →

About Omnigent

Omnigent is an open source AI agent framework and meta harness in the Developer Tools and AI Assisted Coding ecosystem. It provides a common orchestration layer over Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, OpenCode, Hermes, Pi, and custom YAML agents. The Python project uses the Apache 2.0 license and combines different harnesses without rewriting the workflow.

read the full Omnigent overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 263K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 209K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K

Related comparisons

codegraph vs code-review-graph openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip openclaw vs langflow ecc vs react ecc vs langflow react vs langflow ecc vs supabase react vs supabase n8n vs langflow ecc vs puppeteer react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed vscode vs neovim vscode vs zed

More AI Assisted Coding projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Assisted Coding field.

codegraph vs OpenCode codegraph vs pi codegraph vs OpenHands codegraph vs Paperclip codegraph vs rtk codegraph vs Orca codegraph vs Cline codegraph vs Aider codegraph vs Continue codegraph vs Tabby codegraph vs Grok Build codegraph vs T3 Code

Frequently asked questions

Is codegraph or Omnigent more popular?

codegraph has 71,514 GitHub stars and Omnigent has 10,106. codegraph has the larger community by that measure.

Are codegraph and Omnigent free?

Both are open source. codegraph is licensed under MIT and Omnigent under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between codegraph and Omnigent?

codegraph is written in C and Omnigent in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, codegraph or Omnigent?

Choose codegraph if you want the larger community (71,514 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Omnigent if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.