head to head · open source
codegraph vs Kodus
codegraph has 76,441 GitHub stars, 5,077 forks, 244 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. Kodus has 1,559 stars, 187 forks, 100 open issues and last shipped yesterday. codegraph leads on adoption by 4,803% (76,441 vs 1,559 stars). codegraph is written in TypeScript under MIT; Kodus is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence. codegraph has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, Kodus 12%. Kodus was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| codegraph | Kodus | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 76K | ★ 1.6K |
| License | MIT | Custom / other |
| Written in | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-01 | 2026-11-04 |
| Forks | ⑂ 5.1K | ⑂ 187 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick codegraph if
- You weight community size — 76K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Kodus if
- You want the Kodus feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and Kodus fits your workflow better
About codegraph
CodeGraph Already installed? Run codegraph upgrade Follow @getcodegraph on X for updates. Supercharge Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, OpenCode, Hermes Agent, Gemini, Antigravity, Kiro, GitHub Copilot, and more with Semantic Code Intelligence The fastest complete code graph · surgical context · built for how agents actually work · 100% local Kernel powered by Rust Documentation & Website → The CodeGraph platform is coming — for every PR, know exactly what to test, what could break, which flows are affected, and whether business logic is compromised. Get early beta access to the hosted product · getcodegraph.com…
read the full codegraph overview →
About Kodus
Website · Community · Docs · CLI Docs · Try Kodus Cloud · Self Host Guide 🌐 English · Português (BR) · Español · 日本語 · 简体中文 · Français Why Teams Choose Kodus Model Agnostic : Use Claude, GPT 5, Gemini, Llama, GLM, Kimi or any OpenAI compatible endpoint. Zero Markup on LLM Costs : You pay model providers directly. No hidden multipliers. Learns from Your Context : Kody adapts to your architecture, standards, and workflow. You Set the Rules : Define custom review rules in plain language. Privacy & Security : Source code is not used to train models, data is encrypted in transit and at rest, and self hosted runners…
read the full Kodus overview →
More in Developer Tools
Related comparisons
More AI Assisted Coding projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Assisted Coding field.
Frequently asked questions
Is codegraph or Kodus more popular?
codegraph has 76,441 GitHub stars and Kodus has 1,559. codegraph has the larger community by that measure.
Are codegraph and Kodus free?
Both are open source. codegraph is licensed under MIT, and Kodus has no licence declared in this registry. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between codegraph and Kodus?
codegraph is written in TypeScript and Kodus in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, codegraph or Kodus?
Choose codegraph if you want the larger community (76,441 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Kodus if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.