head to head · open source
CloudFlare-ImgBed vs oryx
CloudFlare-ImgBed has 6,496 GitHub stars, 8,261 forks, 42 open issues and last shipped 7 days ago. oryx has 881 stars, 158 forks, 49 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. CloudFlare-ImgBed leads on adoption by 637% (6,496 vs 881 stars). CloudFlare-ImgBed is written in JavaScript under MIT; oryx is written in Go under MIT. CloudFlare-ImgBed has attracted 127% as many forks as stars, oryx 18%. oryx was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (media-server), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| CloudFlare-ImgBed | oryx | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 6.5K | ★ 881 |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | JavaScript | Go |
| Last push | 2026-09-11 | 2026-09-14 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.3K | ⑂ 158 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick CloudFlare-ImgBed if
- You weight community size — 6.5K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick oryx if
- You want the oryx feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and oryx fits your workflow better
About CloudFlare-ImgBed
CloudFlare ImgBed is an MIT licensed, JavaScript based, serverless image and file hosting solution built on Cloudflare that gives individuals and small teams a self hosted management interface for image hosting, secure file storage, and personal cloud drive use.
read the full CloudFlare-ImgBed overview →
About oryx
Oryx (SRS Stack) is an AI driven, all in one, out of the box, open source video solution for creating online video services such as live streaming and WebRTC, in the cloud or through self hosting, aimed at developers and operators who need to run those services themselves.
More in Content & Publishing
Related comparisons
More Digital Asset Management (DAM) projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Digital Asset Management (DAM) field.
Frequently asked questions
Is CloudFlare-ImgBed or oryx more popular?
CloudFlare-ImgBed has 6,496 GitHub stars and oryx has 881. CloudFlare-ImgBed has the larger community by that measure.
Are CloudFlare-ImgBed and oryx free?
Both are open source. CloudFlare-ImgBed is licensed under MIT and oryx under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between CloudFlare-ImgBed and oryx?
CloudFlare-ImgBed is written in JavaScript and oryx in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, CloudFlare-ImgBed or oryx?
Choose CloudFlare-ImgBed if you want the larger community (6,496 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose oryx if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.