head to head · open source
CloudFlare-ImgBed vs oryx
CloudFlare-ImgBed has 6,852 GitHub stars, 8,746 forks, 42 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. oryx has 891 stars, 160 forks, 49 open issues and last shipped 11 days ago. CloudFlare-ImgBed leads on adoption by 669% (6,852 vs 891 stars). CloudFlare-ImgBed is written in JavaScript under MIT; oryx is written in Go under MIT. CloudFlare-ImgBed has attracted 128% as many forks as stars, oryx 18%. CloudFlare-ImgBed was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (media-server), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| CloudFlare-ImgBed | oryx | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 6.9K | ★ 891 |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | JavaScript | Go |
| Last push | 2026-10-31 | 2026-10-23 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.7K | ⑂ 160 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick CloudFlare-ImgBed if
- You weight community size — 6.9K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick oryx if
- You want the oryx feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and oryx fits your workflow better
About CloudFlare-ImgBed
🗂️ Beyond image hosting: an all in one, open source file management hub. 简体中文 English Official Website [!IMPORTANT] If you encounter issues, please check the announcement first. Important notifications and non compatible updates will be explained in the announcement! 1. 💡 Introduction CloudFlare ImgBed is a self hosted image and file hosting solution for Docker and serverless environments, bringing Telegram , Discord , Cloudflare R2 , S3 compatible storage , Hugging Face , WebDAV , and more into one management interface. It provides file management, authentication, directory organization, content moderation, a…
read the full CloudFlare-ImgBed overview →
About oryx
ORYX Oryx(SRS Stack), is an all in one, out of the box, and open source video solution for creating online video services, including live streaming and WebRTC, on the cloud or through self hosting. Note: We renamed the project from SRS Stack to Oryx, because we only need a new name for AI assistant to identify SRS and SRS Stack. AI assistant is confused with SRS and SRS Stack. Oryx makes it easy for you to create an online video service. It is made using Go, Reactjs, SRS, FFmpeg, and WebRTC. It supports protocols like RTMP, WebRTC, HLS, HTTP FLV, and SRT. It offers features like authentication, streaming on…
More in Content & Publishing
Related comparisons
More Digital Asset Management (DAM) projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Digital Asset Management (DAM) field.
Frequently asked questions
Is CloudFlare-ImgBed or oryx more popular?
CloudFlare-ImgBed has 6,852 GitHub stars and oryx has 891. CloudFlare-ImgBed has the larger community by that measure.
Are CloudFlare-ImgBed and oryx free?
Both are open source. CloudFlare-ImgBed is licensed under MIT and oryx under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between CloudFlare-ImgBed and oryx?
CloudFlare-ImgBed is written in JavaScript and oryx in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, CloudFlare-ImgBed or oryx?
Choose CloudFlare-ImgBed if you want the larger community (6,852 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose oryx if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.