head to head · open source

CloudFlare-ImgBed vs foss_photo_libraries

CloudFlare-ImgBed has 6,852 GitHub stars, 8,746 forks, 42 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. foss_photo_libraries has 2,818 stars, 73 forks, 27 open issues and last shipped 7 months ago. CloudFlare-ImgBed leads on adoption by 143% (6,852 vs 2,818 stars). CloudFlare-ImgBed is written in JavaScript under MIT; foss_photo_libraries is written in Python under MIT. CloudFlare-ImgBed has attracted 128% as many forks as stars, foss_photo_libraries 3%. CloudFlare-ImgBed was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

CloudFlare-ImgBed ★ 6.9K foss_photo_libraries ★ 2.8K category Content & Publishing

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

CloudFlare-ImgBed foss_photo_libraries
GitHub stars ★ 6.9K ★ 2.8K
License MIT MIT
Written in JavaScript Python
Last push 2026-10-31 2026-04-18
Forks ⑂ 8.7K ⑂ 73
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick CloudFlare-ImgBed if

  • You weight community size — 6.9K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full CloudFlare-ImgBed profile →

pick foss_photo_libraries if

  • You want the foss_photo_libraries feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and foss_photo_libraries fits your workflow better

full foss_photo_libraries profile →

About CloudFlare-ImgBed

🗂️ Beyond image hosting: an all in one, open source file management hub. 简体中文 English Official Website [!IMPORTANT] If you encounter issues, please check the announcement first. Important notifications and non compatible updates will be explained in the announcement! 1. 💡 Introduction CloudFlare ImgBed is a self hosted image and file hosting solution for Docker and serverless environments, bringing Telegram , Discord , Cloudflare R2 , S3 compatible storage , Hugging Face , WebDAV , and more into one management interface. It provides file management, authentication, directory organization, content moderation, a…

read the full CloudFlare-ImgBed overview →

About foss_photo_libraries

📸 Free and OpenSource Photo Libraries There are many great free and open source alternatives to closed source and/or paid photo libraries. This project aims to track and compare the feature set between the many different options with a focus on 'Gratis' (free as in free beer) open source photo libraries. 'Libre' (free as in free speech) projects are also welcome, but will likely need to be submitted via a pull request since the time in testing each different project is significant. ⚠️ Disclaimer: This repository displays both objective and subjective measures of feature quality. The owner of this repository…

read the full foss_photo_libraries overview →

More in Content & Publishing

Related comparisons

More Digital Asset Management (DAM) projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Digital Asset Management (DAM) field.

Frequently asked questions

Is CloudFlare-ImgBed or foss_photo_libraries more popular?

CloudFlare-ImgBed has 6,852 GitHub stars and foss_photo_libraries has 2,818. CloudFlare-ImgBed has the larger community by that measure.

Are CloudFlare-ImgBed and foss_photo_libraries free?

Both are open source. CloudFlare-ImgBed is licensed under MIT and foss_photo_libraries under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between CloudFlare-ImgBed and foss_photo_libraries?

CloudFlare-ImgBed is written in JavaScript and foss_photo_libraries in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, CloudFlare-ImgBed or foss_photo_libraries?

Choose CloudFlare-ImgBed if you want the larger community (6,852 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose foss_photo_libraries if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.