head to head · open source
CloudFlare-ImgBed vs foss_photo_libraries
CloudFlare-ImgBed has 6,496 GitHub stars, 8,261 forks, 42 open issues and last shipped 7 days ago. foss_photo_libraries has 2,803 stars, 72 forks, 27 open issues and last shipped 5 months ago. CloudFlare-ImgBed leads on adoption by 132% (6,496 vs 2,803 stars). CloudFlare-ImgBed is written in JavaScript under MIT; foss_photo_libraries is written in Python under MIT. CloudFlare-ImgBed has attracted 127% as many forks as stars, foss_photo_libraries 3%. CloudFlare-ImgBed was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| CloudFlare-ImgBed | foss_photo_libraries | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 6.5K | ★ 2.8K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | JavaScript | Python |
| Last push | 2026-09-11 | 2026-04-18 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.3K | ⑂ 72 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick CloudFlare-ImgBed if
- You weight community size — 6.5K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick foss_photo_libraries if
- You want the foss_photo_libraries feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and foss_photo_libraries fits your workflow better
About CloudFlare-ImgBed
CloudFlare ImgBed is an MIT licensed, JavaScript based, serverless image and file hosting solution built on Cloudflare that gives individuals and small teams a self hosted management interface for image hosting, secure file storage, and personal cloud drive use.
read the full CloudFlare-ImgBed overview →
About foss_photo_libraries
foss photo libraries is a free and open source comparison project for photo libraries and digital asset management tools. It is an MIT licensed Python repository that maintains a public list of alternatives, including Chevereto, Damselfly, Ente, Foldergram, HomeGallery, Immich, Librephotos, Lychee, Nextcloud Photos, Nextcloud Memories, Photonix, Photofield, PiGallery2, PhotoPrism, Photoview, Piwigo, and Snapcrescent.
read the full foss_photo_libraries overview →
More in Content & Publishing
Related comparisons
More Digital Asset Management (DAM) projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Digital Asset Management (DAM) field.
Frequently asked questions
Is CloudFlare-ImgBed or foss_photo_libraries more popular?
CloudFlare-ImgBed has 6,496 GitHub stars and foss_photo_libraries has 2,803. CloudFlare-ImgBed has the larger community by that measure.
Are CloudFlare-ImgBed and foss_photo_libraries free?
Both are open source. CloudFlare-ImgBed is licensed under MIT and foss_photo_libraries under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between CloudFlare-ImgBed and foss_photo_libraries?
CloudFlare-ImgBed is written in JavaScript and foss_photo_libraries in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, CloudFlare-ImgBed or foss_photo_libraries?
Choose CloudFlare-ImgBed if you want the larger community (6,496 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose foss_photo_libraries if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.