head to head · open source
CloudFlare-ImgBed vs Lychee
CloudFlare-ImgBed has 6,852 GitHub stars, 8,746 forks, 42 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. Lychee has 4,326 stars, 385 forks, 37 open issues and last shipped yesterday. CloudFlare-ImgBed leads on adoption by 58% (6,852 vs 4,326 stars). CloudFlare-ImgBed is written in JavaScript under MIT; Lychee is written in PHP under MIT. CloudFlare-ImgBed has attracted 128% as many forks as stars, Lychee 9%. Lychee was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| CloudFlare-ImgBed | Lychee | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 6.9K | ★ 4.3K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | JavaScript | PHP |
| Last push | 2026-10-31 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.7K | ⑂ 385 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick CloudFlare-ImgBed if
- You weight community size — 6.9K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Lychee if
- You want the Lychee feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches PHP
- You evaluated both and Lychee fits your workflow better
About CloudFlare-ImgBed
🗂️ Beyond image hosting: an all in one, open source file management hub. 简体中文 English Official Website [!IMPORTANT] If you encounter issues, please check the announcement first. Important notifications and non compatible updates will be explained in the announcement! 1. 💡 Introduction CloudFlare ImgBed is a self hosted image and file hosting solution for Docker and serverless environments, bringing Telegram , Discord , Cloudflare R2 , S3 compatible storage , Hugging Face , WebDAV , and more into one management interface. It provides file management, authentication, directory organization, content moderation, a…
read the full CloudFlare-ImgBed overview →
About Lychee
[![GitHub Release][release shield]]( [![PHP 8.4 & 8.5][php shield]]( [![MIT License][license shield]]( [![Downloads][download shield]]( [![Build Status][build status shield]]( [![Code Coverage][codecov shield]]( [![CII Best Practices Summary][cii shield]]( [![OpenSSF Scorecard][ossf shield]]( [![Website][website shield]]( [![Documentation][docs shield]]( [![Changelog][changelog shield]]( [![Discord][discord shield]][discord] Lychee: A Stunning and User Friendly Photo Management System Lychee is a free, open source photo management tool that runs on your server or web space. Installation is quick and easy, taking…
read the full Lychee overview →
More in Content & Publishing
Related comparisons
More Digital Asset Management (DAM) projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Digital Asset Management (DAM) field.
Frequently asked questions
Is CloudFlare-ImgBed or Lychee more popular?
CloudFlare-ImgBed has 6,852 GitHub stars and Lychee has 4,326. CloudFlare-ImgBed has the larger community by that measure.
Are CloudFlare-ImgBed and Lychee free?
Both are open source. CloudFlare-ImgBed is licensed under MIT and Lychee under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between CloudFlare-ImgBed and Lychee?
CloudFlare-ImgBed is written in JavaScript and Lychee in PHP. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, CloudFlare-ImgBed or Lychee?
Choose CloudFlare-ImgBed if you want the larger community (6,852 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Lychee if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.