head to head · open source
CloudFlare-ImgBed vs HolyArrs
CloudFlare-ImgBed has 6,893 GitHub stars, 8,805 forks, 42 open issues and last shipped 9 days ago. HolyArrs has 786 stars, 38 forks, 77 open issues and last shipped yesterday. CloudFlare-ImgBed leads on adoption by 777% (6,893 vs 786 stars). CloudFlare-ImgBed is written in JavaScript under MIT; HolyArrs is written in Go under AGPL-3.0. CloudFlare-ImgBed has attracted 128% as many forks as stars, HolyArrs 5%. HolyArrs was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (media-server), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| CloudFlare-ImgBed | HolyArrs | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 6.9K | ★ 786 |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | JavaScript | Go |
| Last push | 2026-11-03 | 2026-11-11 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.8K | ⑂ 38 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick CloudFlare-ImgBed if
- You weight community size — 6.9K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick HolyArrs if
- You want the HolyArrs feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and HolyArrs fits your workflow better
About CloudFlare-ImgBed
🗂️ Beyond image hosting: an all in one, open source file management hub. 简体中文 English Official Website [!IMPORTANT] If you encounter issues, please check the announcement first. Important notifications and non compatible updates will be explained in the announcement! 1. 💡 Introduction CloudFlare ImgBed is a self hosted image and file hosting solution for Docker and serverless environments, bringing Telegram , Discord , Cloudflare R2 , S3 compatible storage , Hugging Face , WebDAV , and more into one management interface. It provides file management, authentication, directory organization, content moderation, a…
read the full CloudFlare-ImgBed overview →
About HolyArrs
English · 简体中文 · हिन्दी · Español · Français · العربية · Português · Русский · 日本語 · Deutsch · 한국어 · Italiano · Polski · Nederlands · Türkçe · Українська Six apps to watch a show. Now it's one. HolyArrs is one self hosted app for your shows, movies and music. Browse like a streaming app, ask for what you want, and it handles the rest. About 15 MB to download · about 140 MB of RAM idle with 10,000 titles · amd64, arm64, armv7 The six apps it replaces download 718.2 MB together. Quick start · Why · What it does · Moving from other apps · The manual · Help 🚀 Running in two minutes Save this as docker compose.yml…
read the full HolyArrs overview →
More in Content & Publishing
Related comparisons
More Digital Asset Management (DAM) projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Digital Asset Management (DAM) field.
Frequently asked questions
Is CloudFlare-ImgBed or HolyArrs more popular?
CloudFlare-ImgBed has 6,893 GitHub stars and HolyArrs has 786. CloudFlare-ImgBed has the larger community by that measure.
Are CloudFlare-ImgBed and HolyArrs free?
Both are open source. CloudFlare-ImgBed is licensed under MIT and HolyArrs under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between CloudFlare-ImgBed and HolyArrs?
CloudFlare-ImgBed is written in JavaScript and HolyArrs in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, CloudFlare-ImgBed or HolyArrs?
Choose CloudFlare-ImgBed if you want the larger community (6,893 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose HolyArrs if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.