head to head · open source

caddy vs smartdns

caddy has 75,840 GitHub stars, 4,970 forks, 286 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. smartdns has 11,312 stars, 1,247 forks, 320 open issues and last shipped 20 days ago. caddy leads on adoption by 570% (75,840 vs 11,312 stars). caddy is written in Go under Apache-2.0; smartdns is written in C under GPL-3.0. caddy has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, smartdns 11%. caddy was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

caddy ★ 76K smartdns ★ 11K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

caddy smartdns
GitHub stars ★ 76K ★ 11K
License Apache-2.0 GPL-3.0
Written in Go C
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-08-30
Forks ⑂ 5.0K ⑂ 1.2K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick caddy if

  • You weight community size — 76K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full caddy profile →

pick smartdns if

  • You want the smartdns feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches C
  • You evaluated both and smartdns fits your workflow better

full smartdns profile →

About caddy

Caddy is a Go based, Apache 2.0 licensed HTTP/1.1, HTTP/2, and HTTP/3 web server and reverse proxy that obtains and renews TLS certificates automatically by default, built for operators and teams who want every site on HTTPS without maintaining a separate certificate workflow.

read the full caddy overview →

About smartdns

SmartDNS is a local DNS server, written in C and licensed under GPL 3.0, that accepts DNS queries from local clients, asks multiple upstream DNS servers, and returns the IP address with the fastest measured access speed — built for self hosters, router owners, and network operators who want faster name resolution and stronger privacy.

read the full smartdns overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

immich vs openvpn immich vs wr-do uptime-kuma vs openvpn worldmonitor vs openvpn mall vs openvpn uptime-kuma vs wr-do worldmonitor vs wr-do mall vs wr-do n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra ansible vs haystack

More Networking & Connectivity projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Networking & Connectivity field.

caddy vs frp caddy vs traefik caddy vs AdGuardHome caddy vs nginx caddy vs algo caddy vs openvpn-install caddy vs amnezia-client caddy vs OpenVPN caddy vs coredns caddy vs sliver caddy vs OpenSurge-for-Mac caddy vs WR.DO

Frequently asked questions

Is caddy or smartdns more popular?

caddy has 75,840 GitHub stars and smartdns has 11,312. caddy has the larger community by that measure.

Are caddy and smartdns free?

Both are open source. caddy is licensed under Apache-2.0 and smartdns under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between caddy and smartdns?

caddy is written in Go and smartdns in C. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, caddy or smartdns?

Choose caddy if you want the larger community (75,840 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose smartdns if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.