head to head · open source

caddy vs openvpn-install

caddy has 75,840 GitHub stars, 4,970 forks, 286 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. openvpn-install has 16,133 stars, 3,336 forks, 24 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. caddy leads on adoption by 370% (75,840 vs 16,133 stars). caddy is written in Go under Apache-2.0; openvpn-install is written in Shell under MIT. caddy has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, openvpn-install 21%. caddy was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (privacy), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

caddy ★ 76K openvpn-install ★ 16K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

caddy openvpn-install
GitHub stars ★ 76K ★ 16K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in Go Shell
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-16
Forks ⑂ 5.0K ⑂ 3.3K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick caddy if

  • You weight community size — 76K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full caddy profile →

pick openvpn-install if

  • You want the openvpn-install feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Shell
  • You evaluated both and openvpn-install fits your workflow better

full openvpn-install profile →

About caddy

Caddy is a Go based, Apache 2.0 licensed HTTP/1.1, HTTP/2, and HTTP/3 web server and reverse proxy that obtains and renews TLS certificates automatically by default, built for operators and teams who want every site on HTTPS without maintaining a separate certificate workflow.

read the full caddy overview →

About openvpn-install

openvpn install is an MIT licensed Bash script that installs and manages a self hosted OpenVPN server on Debian, Ubuntu, Fedora, openSUSE, CentOS, Amazon Linux, Arch Linux, Oracle Linux, Rocky Linux and AlmaLinux, aimed at anyone who runs their own VPS, dedicated server or home machine and wants to generate VPN client configuration files per device.

read the full openvpn-install overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

immich vs openvpn immich vs wr-do uptime-kuma vs openvpn worldmonitor vs openvpn mall vs openvpn uptime-kuma vs wr-do worldmonitor vs wr-do mall vs wr-do n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra ansible vs haystack

More Networking & Connectivity projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Networking & Connectivity field.

caddy vs frp caddy vs traefik caddy vs AdGuardHome caddy vs nginx caddy vs algo caddy vs amnezia-client caddy vs OpenVPN caddy vs coredns caddy vs sliver caddy vs smartdns caddy vs OpenSurge-for-Mac caddy vs WR.DO

Frequently asked questions

Is caddy or openvpn-install more popular?

caddy has 75,840 GitHub stars and openvpn-install has 16,133. caddy has the larger community by that measure.

Are caddy and openvpn-install free?

Both are open source. caddy is licensed under Apache-2.0 and openvpn-install under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between caddy and openvpn-install?

caddy is written in Go and openvpn-install in Shell. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, caddy or openvpn-install?

Choose caddy if you want the larger community (75,840 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose openvpn-install if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.