head to head · open source

caddy vs OpenVPN

caddy has 75,840 GitHub stars, 4,970 forks, 286 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. OpenVPN has 14,569 stars, 3,401 forks, 226 open issues and last shipped yesterday. caddy leads on adoption by 421% (75,840 vs 14,569 stars). caddy is written in Go under Apache-2.0; OpenVPN is written in C under a custom or non-standard licence. caddy has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, OpenVPN 23%. OpenVPN was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

caddy ★ 76K OpenVPN ★ 15K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

caddy OpenVPN
GitHub stars ★ 76K ★ 15K
License Apache-2.0 Custom / other
Written in Go C
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 5.0K ⑂ 3.4K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick caddy if

  • You weight community size — 76K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full caddy profile →

pick OpenVPN if

  • You want the OpenVPN feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches C
  • You evaluated both and OpenVPN fits your workflow better

full OpenVPN profile →

About caddy

Caddy is a Go based, Apache 2.0 licensed HTTP/1.1, HTTP/2, and HTTP/3 web server and reverse proxy that obtains and renews TLS certificates automatically by default, built for operators and teams who want every site on HTTPS without maintaining a separate certificate workflow.

read the full caddy overview →

About OpenVPN

OpenVPN is open source VPN daemon. It provides secure tunneling for network connections. Project lives in Infrastructure & Operations / Networking & Connectivity ecosystem. Tagline says Zero Trust VPN solutions for secure business networking. GitHub description says OpenVPN is an open source VPN daemon. Repository language is C. GitHub license field says NOASSERTION, while README states GNU General Public License version 2. README states copyright 2002 2026 OpenVPN Inc.

read the full OpenVPN overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

immich vs openvpn uptime-kuma vs openvpn worldmonitor vs openvpn mall vs openvpn immich vs wr-do uptime-kuma vs wr-do worldmonitor vs wr-do mall vs wr-do n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra ansible vs haystack

More Networking & Connectivity projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Networking & Connectivity field.

caddy vs frp caddy vs traefik caddy vs AdGuardHome caddy vs nginx caddy vs algo caddy vs openvpn-install caddy vs amnezia-client caddy vs coredns caddy vs sliver caddy vs smartdns caddy vs OpenSurge-for-Mac caddy vs WR.DO

Frequently asked questions

Is caddy or OpenVPN more popular?

caddy has 75,840 GitHub stars and OpenVPN has 14,569. caddy has the larger community by that measure.

Are caddy and OpenVPN free?

Both are open source. caddy is licensed under Apache-2.0, and OpenVPN has no licence declared in this registry. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between caddy and OpenVPN?

caddy is written in Go and OpenVPN in C. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, caddy or OpenVPN?

Choose caddy if you want the larger community (75,840 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose OpenVPN if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.