head to head · open source
caddy vs landscape
caddy has 76,129 GitHub stars, 5,010 forks, 286 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. landscape has 1,558 stars, 121 forks, 29 open issues and last shipped today. caddy leads on adoption by 4,786% (76,129 vs 1,558 stars). caddy is written in Go under Apache-2.0; landscape is written in Rust under GPL-3.0. caddy has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, landscape 8%. landscape was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| caddy | landscape | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 76K | ★ 1.6K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Written in | Go | Rust |
| Last push | 2026-09-26 | 2026-09-28 |
| Forks | ⑂ 5.0K | ⑂ 121 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick caddy if
- You weight community size — 76K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick landscape if
- You want the landscape feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Rust
- You evaluated both and landscape fits your workflow better
About caddy
Caddy is a Go based, Apache 2.0 licensed HTTP/1.1, HTTP/2, and HTTP/3 web server and reverse proxy that obtains and renews TLS certificates automatically by default, built for operators and teams who want every site on HTTPS without maintaining a separate certificate workflow.
read the full caddy overview →
About landscape
Landscape is an open source router platform that configures a standard Linux distribution as a router by steering traffic by domain rather than IP alone, built in Rust with eBPF and aimed at self hosters who want policy routing on hardware and distributions they already control.
read the full landscape overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Networking & Connectivity projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Networking & Connectivity field.
Frequently asked questions
Is caddy or landscape more popular?
caddy has 76,129 GitHub stars and landscape has 1,558. caddy has the larger community by that measure.
Are caddy and landscape free?
Both are open source. caddy is licensed under Apache-2.0 and landscape under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between caddy and landscape?
caddy is written in Go and landscape in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, caddy or landscape?
Choose caddy if you want the larger community (76,129 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose landscape if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.