head to head · open source

caddy vs hestiacp

caddy has 75,951 GitHub stars, 4,988 forks, 286 open issues and last shipped yesterday. hestiacp has 4,503 stars, 945 forks, 146 open issues and last shipped yesterday. caddy leads on adoption by 1,587% (75,951 vs 4,503 stars). caddy is written in Go under Apache-2.0; hestiacp is written in Shell under GPL-3.0. caddy has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, hestiacp 21%. caddy was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

caddy ★ 76K hestiacp ★ 4.5K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

caddy hestiacp
GitHub stars ★ 76K ★ 4.5K
License Apache-2.0 GPL-3.0
Written in Go Shell
Last push 2026-09-21 2026-09-21
Forks ⑂ 5.0K ⑂ 945
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick caddy if

  • You weight community size — 76K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full caddy profile →

pick hestiacp if

  • You want the hestiacp feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Shell
  • You evaluated both and hestiacp fits your workflow better

full hestiacp profile →

About caddy

Caddy is a Go based, Apache 2.0 licensed HTTP/1.1, HTTP/2, and HTTP/3 web server and reverse proxy that obtains and renews TLS certificates automatically by default, built for operators and teams who want every site on HTTPS without maintaining a separate certificate workflow.

read the full caddy overview →

About hestiacp

Hestia Control Panel is a GPL 3.0, shell based control panel that gives Linux server administrators a web and command line interface for deploying and managing web domains, mail accounts, DNS zones, and databases on Debian and Ubuntu servers.

read the full hestiacp overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

frp vs caddy caddy vs traefik frp vs traefik frp vs adguardhome frp vs nginx frp vs algo frp vs nginx-proxy immich vs openvpn n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra

More Networking & Connectivity projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Networking & Connectivity field.

caddy vs frp caddy vs traefik caddy vs AdGuardHome caddy vs nginx caddy vs algo caddy vs nginx-proxy caddy vs goproxy caddy vs openvpn-install caddy vs cloudflared caddy vs amnezia-client caddy vs OpenVPN caddy vs coredns

Frequently asked questions

Is caddy or hestiacp more popular?

caddy has 75,951 GitHub stars and hestiacp has 4,503. caddy has the larger community by that measure.

Are caddy and hestiacp free?

Both are open source. caddy is licensed under Apache-2.0 and hestiacp under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between caddy and hestiacp?

caddy is written in Go and hestiacp in Shell. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, caddy or hestiacp?

Choose caddy if you want the larger community (75,951 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose hestiacp if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.