head to head · open source

Bitwarden vs Padloc

Bitwarden has 20,156 GitHub stars, 1,772 forks, 230 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Padloc has 2,922 stars, 266 forks, 105 open issues and last shipped 1.5 years ago. Bitwarden leads on adoption by 590% (20,156 vs 2,922 stars). Bitwarden is written in C# under a custom or non-standard licence; Padloc is written in JavaScript under AGPL-3.0. Bitwarden has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, Padloc 9%. Bitwarden was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Bitwarden ★ 20K Padloc ★ 2.9K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Bitwarden Padloc
GitHub stars ★ 20K ★ 2.9K
License Custom / other AGPL-3.0
Written in C# JavaScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2025-03-29
Forks ⑂ 1.8K ⑂ 266
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Bitwarden if

  • You weight community size — 20K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches C#
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Bitwarden profile →

pick Padloc if

  • You want the Padloc feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and Padloc fits your workflow better

full Padloc profile →

About Bitwarden

Bitwarden Server is the backend infrastructure for Bitwarden client applications, and it lives in the .NET ecosystem. The repository contains the APIs, database, and core services that support secure password management for individuals and businesses.

read the full Bitwarden overview →

About Padloc

Padloc is an open source password and data manager for individuals and teams, distributed under the AGPL 3.0 license and written primarily in JavaScript and TypeScript. It lives in the JavaScript and TypeScript ecosystem, and the repository is organized as a monorepo split into separate packages: a core logic library, a web based UI component library, a backend server, a Progressive Web App client, a localization package, an Electron desktop app, a Cordova project for iOS and Android, a Tauri based cross platform native app, and a browser extension. The project positions itself as an open alternative to 1Password…

read the full Padloc overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K Browser Use ★ 115K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K

Related comparisons

keepassxc vs bitwarden bitwarden vs aegis-authenticator keepassxc vs padloc bitwarden vs passbolt keepassxc vs aegis-authenticator keepassxc vs passbolt keepassxc vs 2fas keepassxc vs pearpass n8n vs browser-use n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces n8n vs skyvern n8n vs automa n8n vs livekit n8n vs obs-studio n8n vs sharex n8n vs kap excalidraw vs obs-studio n8n vs snapify excalidraw vs sharex excalidraw vs kap excalidraw vs snapify

More Password & Secret Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Password & Secret Management field.

Bitwarden vs KeePassXC Bitwarden vs Aegis Authenticator Bitwarden vs Passbolt Bitwarden vs 2FAS Bitwarden vs PearPass

Frequently asked questions

Is Bitwarden or Padloc more popular?

Bitwarden has 20,156 GitHub stars and Padloc has 2,922. Bitwarden has the larger community by that measure.

Are Bitwarden and Padloc free?

Both are open source. Bitwarden has no licence declared in this registry, and Padloc is licensed under AGPL-3.0. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between Bitwarden and Padloc?

Bitwarden is written in C# and Padloc in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Bitwarden or Padloc?

Choose Bitwarden if you want the larger community (20,156 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose Padloc if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.