head to head · open source

anime vs material-design-for-bootstrap

anime has 73,075 GitHub stars, 4,940 forks, 118 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. material-design-for-bootstrap has 9,247 stars, 1,108 forks, 29 open issues and last shipped 6 months ago. anime leads on adoption by 690% (73,075 vs 9,247 stars). anime is written in JavaScript under MIT; material-design-for-bootstrap is written in JavaScript under MIT. anime has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, material-design-for-bootstrap 12%. anime was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (css, javascript), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

anime ★ 73K material-design-for-bootstrap ★ 9.2K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

anime material-design-for-bootstrap
GitHub stars ★ 73K ★ 9.2K
License MIT MIT
Written in JavaScript JavaScript
Last push 2026-08-21 2026-03-27
Forks ⑂ 4.9K ⑂ 1.1K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick anime if

  • You weight community size — 73K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full anime profile →

pick material-design-for-bootstrap if

  • You want the material-design-for-bootstrap feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and material-design-for-bootstrap fits your workflow better

full material-design-for-bootstrap profile →

About anime

Anime.js is a free, MIT licensed JavaScript animation engine for developers who need to animate CSS properties, SVG, DOM attributes, and plain JavaScript objects from a single lightweight API.

read the full anime overview →

About material-design-for-bootstrap

Material Design for Bootstrap is a free, MIT licensed UI kit that applies Google Material Design styling to the Bootstrap 4 front end framework, aimed at developers and designers building responsive, mobile first websites and applications.

read the full material-design-for-bootstrap overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 184K Godot ★ 118K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 98K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

ant-design vs open-design ant-design vs manim open-design vs manim firecrawl vs openpencil firecrawl vs draw-io firecrawl vs plasmic firecrawl vs quant-ux firecrawl vs grida firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy

More Design & Prototyping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Design & Prototyping field.

anime vs ant-design anime vs open-design anime vs manim anime vs hyperframes anime vs daisyui anime vs tabler anime vs motion anime vs layui anime vs lottie-ios anime vs vant anime vs primitives anime vs mojs

Frequently asked questions

Is anime or material-design-for-bootstrap more popular?

anime has 73,075 GitHub stars and material-design-for-bootstrap has 9,247. anime has the larger community by that measure.

Are anime and material-design-for-bootstrap free?

Both are open source. anime is licensed under MIT and material-design-for-bootstrap under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between anime and material-design-for-bootstrap?

anime is written in JavaScript and material-design-for-bootstrap in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, anime or material-design-for-bootstrap?

Choose anime if you want the larger community (73,075 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose material-design-for-bootstrap if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.