head to head · open source

anime vs Figma-Context-MCP

anime has 72,899 GitHub stars, 4,929 forks, 118 open issues and last shipped 29 days ago. Figma-Context-MCP has 15,879 stars, 1,262 forks, 25 open issues and last shipped yesterday. anime leads on adoption by 359% (72,899 vs 15,879 stars). anime is written in JavaScript under MIT; Figma-Context-MCP is written in TypeScript under MIT. anime has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, Figma-Context-MCP 8%. Figma-Context-MCP was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

anime ★ 73K Figma-Context-MCP ★ 16K category Miscellaneous

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

anime Figma-Context-MCP
GitHub stars ★ 73K ★ 16K
License MIT MIT
Written in JavaScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-08-21 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 4.9K ⑂ 1.3K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick anime if

  • You weight community size — 73K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full anime profile →

pick Figma-Context-MCP if

  • You want the Figma-Context-MCP feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and Figma-Context-MCP fits your workflow better

full Figma-Context-MCP profile →

About anime

Anime.js is a free, MIT licensed JavaScript animation engine for developers who need to animate CSS properties, SVG, DOM attributes, and plain JavaScript objects from a single lightweight API.

read the full anime overview →

About Figma-Context-MCP

Framelink MCP for Figma is a Model Context Protocol server that gives AI coding agents such as Cursor access to Figma file, frame, and group layout data, so the agent can implement designs directly in code instead of guessing from a screenshot.

read the full Figma-Context-MCP overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 182K Godot ★ 117K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 97K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

firecrawl vs openpencil firecrawl vs draw-io firecrawl vs plasmic firecrawl vs quant-ux firecrawl vs grida openpencil vs draw-io openpencil vs plasmic draw-io vs plasmic firecrawl vs godot firecrawl vs gdevelop godot vs home-assistant firecrawl vs monogame firecrawl vs sbox godot vs gdevelop godot vs monogame godot vs sbox firecrawl vs home-assistant firecrawl vs cratedb firecrawl vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs opencut godot vs cratedb godot vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs cratedb opencut vs cratedb

More Design & Prototyping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Design & Prototyping field.

anime vs ant-design anime vs open-design anime vs manim anime vs hyperframes anime vs daisyui anime vs tabler anime vs Tkinter-Designer anime vs pencil anime vs dicebear anime vs OpenPencil anime vs draw.io anime vs m3e-canvas

Frequently asked questions

Is anime or Figma-Context-MCP more popular?

anime has 72,899 GitHub stars and Figma-Context-MCP has 15,879. anime has the larger community by that measure.

Are anime and Figma-Context-MCP free?

Both are open source. anime is licensed under MIT and Figma-Context-MCP under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between anime and Figma-Context-MCP?

anime is written in JavaScript and Figma-Context-MCP in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, anime or Figma-Context-MCP?

Choose anime if you want the larger community (72,899 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Figma-Context-MCP if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.