head to head · open source

anime vs auto-animate

anime has 73,018 GitHub stars, 4,936 forks, 118 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. auto-animate has 13,924 stars, 260 forks, 44 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. anime leads on adoption by 424% (73,018 vs 13,924 stars). anime is written in JavaScript under MIT; auto-animate is written in TypeScript under MIT. anime has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, auto-animate 2%. anime was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (animation, javascript), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

anime ★ 73K auto-animate ★ 14K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

anime auto-animate
GitHub stars ★ 73K ★ 14K
License MIT MIT
Written in JavaScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-08-21 2026-07-10
Forks ⑂ 4.9K ⑂ 260
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick anime if

  • You weight community size — 73K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full anime profile →

pick auto-animate if

  • You want the auto-animate feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and auto-animate fits your workflow better

full auto-animate profile →

About anime

Anime.js is a free, MIT licensed JavaScript animation engine for developers who need to animate CSS properties, SVG, DOM attributes, and plain JavaScript objects from a single lightweight API.

read the full anime overview →

About auto-animate

AutoAnimate is a zero config, drop in animation utility that adds smooth transitions to a web application with a single line of code, aimed at JavaScript, React, Vue, and Solid developers who want motion in their interfaces without hand writing animation logic.

read the full auto-animate overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 183K Godot ★ 118K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 98K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

ant-design vs open-design ant-design vs manim open-design vs manim firecrawl vs openpencil firecrawl vs draw-io firecrawl vs plasmic firecrawl vs quant-ux firecrawl vs grida firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy

More Design & Prototyping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Design & Prototyping field.

anime vs ant-design anime vs open-design anime vs manim anime vs hyperframes anime vs daisyui anime vs tabler anime vs motion anime vs layui anime vs lottie-ios anime vs vant anime vs primitives anime vs mojs

Frequently asked questions

Is anime or auto-animate more popular?

anime has 73,018 GitHub stars and auto-animate has 13,924. anime has the larger community by that measure.

Are anime and auto-animate free?

Both are open source. anime is licensed under MIT and auto-animate under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between anime and auto-animate?

anime is written in JavaScript and auto-animate in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, anime or auto-animate?

Choose anime if you want the larger community (73,018 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose auto-animate if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.