head to head · open source

android vs camera.ui

android has 3,903 GitHub stars, 1,067 forks, 458 open issues and last shipped yesterday. camera.ui has 1,111 stars, 167 forks, 2 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. android leads on adoption by 251% (3,903 vs 1,111 stars). android is written in Kotlin under Apache-2.0; camera.ui is written in TypeScript under MIT. android has attracted 27% as many forks as stars, camera.ui 15%. android was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (home-automation), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

android ★ 3.9K camera.ui ★ 1.1K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

android camera.ui
GitHub stars ★ 3.9K ★ 1.1K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in Kotlin TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-19 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 1.1K ⑂ 167
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick android if

  • You weight community size — 3.9K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Kotlin
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full android profile →

pick camera.ui if

  • You want the camera.ui feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and camera.ui fits your workflow better

full camera.ui profile →

About android

The Home Assistant Companion for Android is the official Android application for Home Assistant, an open source home automation platform. It is written in Kotlin, released under the Apache 2.0 license, and distributed as an open source app for Android devices. The project sits inside the Home Assistant ecosystem and connects a mobile client to a user's Home Assistant instance.

read the full android overview →

About camera.ui

camera.ui is a self hosted, local first video surveillance platform for security cameras, built for people who want live viewing, 24/7 recording, and on device AI detection while keeping footage on hardware they own.

read the full camera.ui overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 182K Godot ★ 117K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 97K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

firecrawl vs home-assistant godot vs home-assistant three-js vs home-assistant firecrawl vs cratedb firecrawl vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs opencut home-assistant vs frigate godot vs cratedb firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy

More Internet of Things (IoT) projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Internet of Things (IoT) field.

android vs Home Assistant android vs frigate android vs CrateDB android vs python-miio android vs OpenMQTTGateway android vs domoticz android vs IRremoteESP8266 android vs Gladys Assistant android vs button-card android vs iOS android vs supervisor android vs HomeSpan

Frequently asked questions

Is android or camera.ui more popular?

android has 3,903 GitHub stars and camera.ui has 1,111. android has the larger community by that measure.

Are android and camera.ui free?

Both are open source. android is licensed under Apache-2.0 and camera.ui under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between android and camera.ui?

android is written in Kotlin and camera.ui in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, android or camera.ui?

Choose android if you want the larger community (3,903 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose camera.ui if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.