head to head · open source

afrog vs airgorah

afrog has 4,418 GitHub stars, 484 forks, 111 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. airgorah has 3,536 stars, 595 forks, 7 open issues and last shipped yesterday. afrog leads on adoption by 25% (4,418 vs 3,536 stars). afrog is written in HTML under MIT; airgorah is written in Rust under MIT. afrog has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, airgorah 17%. airgorah was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

afrog ★ 4.4K airgorah ★ 3.5K category Security & Privacy

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

afrog airgorah
GitHub stars ★ 4.4K ★ 3.5K
License MIT MIT
Written in HTML Rust
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-19
Forks ⑂ 484 ⑂ 595
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick afrog if

  • You weight community size — 4.4K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches HTML
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full afrog profile →

pick airgorah if

  • You want the airgorah feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and airgorah fits your workflow better

full airgorah profile →

About afrog

afrog is an MIT licensed vulnerability scanner built for bug bounty, penetration testing and red teaming, aimed at testers who need fast verification of web targets and network services with low false positives.

read the full afrog overview →

About airgorah

Airgorah is a WiFi security auditing application written in Rust with a GTK4 graphical interface, built for Linux users such as penetration testers, wireless auditors and security engineers who assess networks they own or are authorised to test.

read the full airgorah overview →

More in Security & Privacy

PayloadsAllTheThings ★ 81K Puter ★ 44K Mattermost ★ 39K Keycloak ★ 37K Tailscale ★ 37K HashiCorp Vault ★ 36K

Related comparisons

payloadsallthethings vs anthropic-cybersecurity-skills payloadsallthethings vs projectdiscovery payloadsallthethings vs pentagi payloadsallthethings vs pentestgpt payloadsallthethings vs osintgram payloadsallthethings vs vuls payloadsallthethings vs osv-scanner payloadsallthethings vs nettacker supabase vs better-auth keycloak vs jumpserver keycloak vs better-auth keycloak vs authelia keycloak vs authentik jumpserver vs better-auth jumpserver vs authelia better-auth vs authelia payloadsallthethings vs vault vaultwarden vs vault payloadsallthethings vs unkey payloadsallthethings vs phase payloadsallthethings vs keyshade puter vs vault mattermost vs vault keycloak vs vault

More Threat Detection & Response projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Threat Detection & Response field.

afrog vs PayloadsAllTheThings afrog vs Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills afrog vs ProjectDiscovery afrog vs pentagi afrog vs PentestGPT afrog vs Osintgram afrog vs vuls afrog vs osv-scanner afrog vs Nettacker afrog vs GDA-android-reversing-Tool afrog vs Raccoon afrog vs Tracecat

Frequently asked questions

Is afrog or airgorah more popular?

afrog has 4,418 GitHub stars and airgorah has 3,536. afrog has the larger community by that measure.

Are afrog and airgorah free?

Both are open source. afrog is licensed under MIT and airgorah under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between afrog and airgorah?

afrog is written in HTML and airgorah in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, afrog or airgorah?

Choose afrog if you want the larger community (4,418 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose airgorah if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.