head to head · open source
Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills vs afrog
Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills has 33,000 GitHub stars, 3,991 forks, 48 open issues and last shipped 20 days ago. afrog has 4,418 stars, 484 forks, 111 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills leads on adoption by 647% (33,000 vs 4,418 stars). Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills is written in Python under Apache-2.0; afrog is written in HTML under MIT. Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, afrog 11%. afrog was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills | afrog | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 33K | ★ 4.4K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | Python | HTML |
| Last push | 2026-08-31 | 2026-09-18 |
| Forks | ⑂ 4.0K | ⑂ 484 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills if
- You weight community size — 33K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick afrog if
- You want the afrog feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches HTML
- You evaluated both and afrog fits your workflow better
About Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
Anthropic Cybersecurity Skills is an Apache 2.0 Python library of 817 structured cybersecurity skills that gives AI agents the working knowledge of a senior security analyst, aimed at security teams, DevSecOps engineers, and red or blue teams that already run agents such as Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, Codex CLI, Cursor, or Gemini CLI.
read the full Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills overview →
About afrog
afrog is an MIT licensed vulnerability scanner built for bug bounty, penetration testing and red teaming, aimed at testers who need fast verification of web targets and network services with low false positives.
read the full afrog overview →
More in Security & Privacy
Related comparisons
More Threat Detection & Response projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Threat Detection & Response field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills or afrog more popular?
Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills has 33,000 GitHub stars and afrog has 4,418. Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills has the larger community by that measure.
Are Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills and afrog free?
Both are open source. Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills is licensed under Apache-2.0 and afrog under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills and afrog?
Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills is written in Python and afrog in HTML. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills or afrog?
Choose Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills if you want the larger community (33,000 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose afrog if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.