head to head · open source
PayloadsAllTheThings vs Nettacker
PayloadsAllTheThings has 82,315 GitHub stars, 17,560 forks, 36 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. Nettacker has 5,702 stars, 1,229 forks, 249 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. PayloadsAllTheThings leads on adoption by 1,344% (82,315 vs 5,702 stars). PayloadsAllTheThings is written in Python under MIT; Nettacker is written in Python under Apache-2.0. PayloadsAllTheThings has attracted 21% as many forks as stars, Nettacker 22%. Nettacker was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (penetration-testing), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| PayloadsAllTheThings | Nettacker | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 82K | ★ 5.7K |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | Python | Python |
| Last push | 2026-10-30 | 2026-10-30 |
| Forks | ⑂ 18K | ⑂ 1.2K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick PayloadsAllTheThings if
- You weight community size — 82K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Nettacker if
- You want the Nettacker feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and Nettacker fits your workflow better
About PayloadsAllTheThings
Payloads All The Things A list of useful payloads and bypasses for Web Application Security. Feel free to improve with your payloads and techniques! You can also contribute with a :beers: IRL, or using the sponsor button. An alternative display version is available at PayloadsAllTheThingsWeb. :book: Documentation Every section contains the following files, you can use the template vuln folder to create a new chapter: README.md vulnerability description and how to exploit it, including several payloads Intruder a set of files to give to Burp Intruder Images pictures for the README.md Files some files referenced…
read the full PayloadsAllTheThings overview →
About Nettacker
OWASP Nettacker ========= DISCLAIMER THIS SOFTWARE WAS CREATED FOR AUTOMATED PENETRATION TESTING AND INFORMATION GATHERING. YOU MUST USE THIS SOFTWARE IN A RESPONSIBLE AND ETHICAL MANNER. DO NOT TARGET SYSTEMS OR APPLICATIONS WITHOUT OBTAINING PERMISSIONS OR CONSENT FROM THE SYSTEM OWNERS OR ADMINISTRATORS. CONTRIBUTORS WILL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY ILLEGAL USAGE. OWASP Nettacker is an open source, Python based automated penetration testing and information gathering framework designed to help cyber security professionals and ethical hackers perform reconnaissance, vulnerability assessments, and network…
read the full Nettacker overview →
More in Security & Privacy
Related comparisons
More Threat Detection & Response projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Threat Detection & Response field.
Frequently asked questions
Is PayloadsAllTheThings or Nettacker more popular?
PayloadsAllTheThings has 82,315 GitHub stars and Nettacker has 5,702. PayloadsAllTheThings has the larger community by that measure.
Are PayloadsAllTheThings and Nettacker free?
Both are open source. PayloadsAllTheThings is licensed under MIT and Nettacker under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between PayloadsAllTheThings and Nettacker?
PayloadsAllTheThings is written in Python and Nettacker in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, PayloadsAllTheThings or Nettacker?
Choose PayloadsAllTheThings if you want the larger community (82,315 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Nettacker if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.