head to head · open source
ProjectDiscovery vs afrog
ProjectDiscovery has 31,319 GitHub stars, 3,877 forks, 107 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. afrog has 4,418 stars, 484 forks, 111 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. ProjectDiscovery leads on adoption by 609% (31,319 vs 4,418 stars). ProjectDiscovery is written in Go under MIT; afrog is written in HTML under MIT. ProjectDiscovery has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, afrog 11%. afrog was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (vulnerability-scanner), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| ProjectDiscovery | afrog | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 31K | ★ 4.4K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Go | HTML |
| Last push | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-18 |
| Forks | ⑂ 3.9K | ⑂ 484 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick ProjectDiscovery if
- You weight community size — 31K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick afrog if
- You want the afrog feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches HTML
- You evaluated both and afrog fits your workflow better
About ProjectDiscovery
Nuclei is a high performance, open source vulnerability scanner built by ProjectDiscovery, part of the ProjectDiscovery ecosystem. It operates as a CLI tool using a simple YAML based DSL to define custom vulnerability checks, enabling precise, real world exploitation simulation to eliminate false positives.
read the full ProjectDiscovery overview →
About afrog
afrog is an MIT licensed vulnerability scanner built for bug bounty, penetration testing and red teaming, aimed at testers who need fast verification of web targets and network services with low false positives.
read the full afrog overview →
More in Security & Privacy
Related comparisons
More Threat Detection & Response projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Threat Detection & Response field.
Frequently asked questions
Is ProjectDiscovery or afrog more popular?
ProjectDiscovery has 31,319 GitHub stars and afrog has 4,418. ProjectDiscovery has the larger community by that measure.
Are ProjectDiscovery and afrog free?
Both are open source. ProjectDiscovery is licensed under MIT and afrog under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between ProjectDiscovery and afrog?
ProjectDiscovery is written in Go and afrog in HTML. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, ProjectDiscovery or afrog?
Choose ProjectDiscovery if you want the larger community (31,319 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose afrog if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.