head to head · open source

PentestGPT vs afrog

PentestGPT has 15,534 GitHub stars, 2,706 forks, 81 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. afrog has 4,418 stars, 484 forks, 111 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. PentestGPT leads on adoption by 252% (15,534 vs 4,418 stars). PentestGPT is written in Python under MIT; afrog is written in HTML under MIT. PentestGPT has attracted 17% as many forks as stars, afrog 11%. afrog was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (penetration-testing), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

PentestGPT ★ 16K afrog ★ 4.4K category Security & Privacy

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

PentestGPT afrog
GitHub stars ★ 16K ★ 4.4K
License MIT MIT
Written in Python HTML
Last push 2026-07-14 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 2.7K ⑂ 484
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick PentestGPT if

  • You weight community size — 16K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full PentestGPT profile →

pick afrog if

  • You want the afrog feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches HTML
  • You evaluated both and afrog fits your workflow better

full afrog profile →

About PentestGPT

PentestGPT is an MIT licensed Python framework that uses large language models to run automated penetration tests and CTF challenges, aimed at penetration testers, security engineers and CTF players who want an agent to drive the tooling rather than working through it by hand.

read the full PentestGPT overview →

About afrog

afrog is an MIT licensed vulnerability scanner built for bug bounty, penetration testing and red teaming, aimed at testers who need fast verification of web targets and network services with low false positives.

read the full afrog overview →

More in Security & Privacy

PayloadsAllTheThings ★ 81K Puter ★ 44K Mattermost ★ 39K Keycloak ★ 37K Tailscale ★ 37K HashiCorp Vault ★ 36K

Related comparisons

payloadsallthethings vs pentestgpt payloadsallthethings vs anthropic-cybersecurity-skills payloadsallthethings vs projectdiscovery payloadsallthethings vs pentagi payloadsallthethings vs osintgram payloadsallthethings vs vuls payloadsallthethings vs osv-scanner payloadsallthethings vs nettacker supabase vs better-auth keycloak vs jumpserver keycloak vs better-auth keycloak vs authelia keycloak vs authentik jumpserver vs better-auth jumpserver vs authelia better-auth vs authelia payloadsallthethings vs vault vaultwarden vs vault payloadsallthethings vs unkey payloadsallthethings vs phase payloadsallthethings vs keyshade puter vs vault mattermost vs vault keycloak vs vault

More Threat Detection & Response projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Threat Detection & Response field.

PentestGPT vs PayloadsAllTheThings PentestGPT vs Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills PentestGPT vs ProjectDiscovery PentestGPT vs pentagi PentestGPT vs Osintgram PentestGPT vs vuls PentestGPT vs osv-scanner PentestGPT vs Nettacker PentestGPT vs GDA-android-reversing-Tool PentestGPT vs Raccoon PentestGPT vs Tracecat PentestGPT vs emba

Frequently asked questions

Is PentestGPT or afrog more popular?

PentestGPT has 15,534 GitHub stars and afrog has 4,418. PentestGPT has the larger community by that measure.

Are PentestGPT and afrog free?

Both are open source. PentestGPT is licensed under MIT and afrog under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between PentestGPT and afrog?

PentestGPT is written in Python and afrog in HTML. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, PentestGPT or afrog?

Choose PentestGPT if you want the larger community (15,534 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose afrog if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.