head to head · open source
GDA-android-reversing-Tool vs afrog
GDA-android-reversing-Tool has 4,834 GitHub stars, 573 forks, 62 open issues and last shipped 5 months ago. afrog has 4,418 stars, 484 forks, 111 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. GDA-android-reversing-Tool leads on adoption by 9% (4,834 vs 4,418 stars). GDA-android-reversing-Tool is written in Python under Apache-2.0; afrog is written in HTML under MIT. GDA-android-reversing-Tool has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, afrog 11%. afrog was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| GDA-android-reversing-Tool | afrog | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 4.8K | ★ 4.4K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | Python | HTML |
| Last push | 2026-04-10 | 2026-09-18 |
| Forks | ⑂ 573 | ⑂ 484 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick GDA-android-reversing-Tool if
- You weight community size — 4.8K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick afrog if
- You want the afrog feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches HTML
- You evaluated both and afrog fits your workflow better
About GDA-android-reversing-Tool
GDA (GJoy Dex Analyzer) is a native C++ Dalvik bytecode decompiler and reverse analysis platform for Android and Java artifacts — APK, DEX, ODEX, OAT, JAR, AAR and CLASS files — built for malware analysts, mobile security auditors and reverse engineers who work without a Java VM.
read the full GDA-android-reversing-Tool overview →
About afrog
afrog is an MIT licensed vulnerability scanner built for bug bounty, penetration testing and red teaming, aimed at testers who need fast verification of web targets and network services with low false positives.
read the full afrog overview →
More in Security & Privacy
Related comparisons
More Threat Detection & Response projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Threat Detection & Response field.
Frequently asked questions
Is GDA-android-reversing-Tool or afrog more popular?
GDA-android-reversing-Tool has 4,834 GitHub stars and afrog has 4,418. GDA-android-reversing-Tool has the larger community by that measure.
Are GDA-android-reversing-Tool and afrog free?
Both are open source. GDA-android-reversing-Tool is licensed under Apache-2.0 and afrog under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between GDA-android-reversing-Tool and afrog?
GDA-android-reversing-Tool is written in Python and afrog in HTML. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, GDA-android-reversing-Tool or afrog?
Choose GDA-android-reversing-Tool if you want the larger community (4,834 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose afrog if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.