head to head · open source
Nettacker vs afrog
Nettacker has 5,596 GitHub stars, 1,181 forks, 249 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. afrog has 4,418 stars, 484 forks, 111 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Nettacker leads on adoption by 27% (5,596 vs 4,418 stars). Nettacker is written in Python under Apache-2.0; afrog is written in HTML under MIT. Nettacker has attracted 21% as many forks as stars, afrog 11%. Nettacker was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (penetration-testing), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Nettacker | afrog | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 5.6K | ★ 4.4K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | Python | HTML |
| Last push | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-18 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.2K | ⑂ 484 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Nettacker if
- You weight community size — 5.6K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick afrog if
- You want the afrog feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches HTML
- You evaluated both and afrog fits your workflow better
About Nettacker
OWASP Nettacker is an open source, Python based automated penetration testing and information gathering framework for cyber security professionals and ethical hackers who need to run reconnaissance, vulnerability assessment, and network security audits efficiently.
read the full Nettacker overview →
About afrog
afrog is an MIT licensed vulnerability scanner built for bug bounty, penetration testing and red teaming, aimed at testers who need fast verification of web targets and network services with low false positives.
read the full afrog overview →
More in Security & Privacy
Related comparisons
More Threat Detection & Response projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Threat Detection & Response field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Nettacker or afrog more popular?
Nettacker has 5,596 GitHub stars and afrog has 4,418. Nettacker has the larger community by that measure.
Are Nettacker and afrog free?
Both are open source. Nettacker is licensed under Apache-2.0 and afrog under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Nettacker and afrog?
Nettacker is written in Python and afrog in HTML. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Nettacker or afrog?
Choose Nettacker if you want the larger community (5,596 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose afrog if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.