head to head · open source
afrog vs Tracecat
afrog has 4,418 GitHub stars, 484 forks, 111 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Tracecat has 3,806 stars, 418 forks, 137 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. afrog leads on adoption by 16% (4,418 vs 3,806 stars). afrog is written in HTML under MIT; Tracecat is written in Python under AGPL-3.0. afrog has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, Tracecat 11%. Tracecat was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| afrog | Tracecat | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 4.4K | ★ 3.8K |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | HTML | Python |
| Last push | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-18 |
| Forks | ⑂ 484 | ⑂ 418 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick afrog if
- You weight community size — 4.4K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches HTML
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Tracecat if
- You want the Tracecat feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and Tracecat fits your workflow better
About afrog
afrog is an MIT licensed vulnerability scanner built for bug bounty, penetration testing and red teaming, aimed at testers who need fast verification of web targets and network services with low false positives.
read the full afrog overview →
About Tracecat
Tracecat is an open source security automation platform for teams and AI agents. It lives in the security operations and incident response ecosystem, combining agents, workflows, lookup tables, and case management in one Python application. The project is licensed under AGPL 3.0, with a separate paid Enterprise Edition directory and feature gates.
read the full Tracecat overview →
More in Security & Privacy
Related comparisons
More Threat Detection & Response projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Threat Detection & Response field.
Frequently asked questions
Is afrog or Tracecat more popular?
afrog has 4,418 GitHub stars and Tracecat has 3,806. afrog has the larger community by that measure.
Are afrog and Tracecat free?
Both are open source. afrog is licensed under MIT and Tracecat under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between afrog and Tracecat?
afrog is written in HTML and Tracecat in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, afrog or Tracecat?
Choose afrog if you want the larger community (4,418 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Tracecat if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.