head to head · open source
afrog vs Raccoon
afrog has 4,418 GitHub stars, 484 forks, 111 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Raccoon has 4,027 stars, 501 forks, 14 open issues and last shipped 5 months ago. afrog leads on adoption by 10% (4,418 vs 4,027 stars). afrog is written in HTML under MIT; Raccoon is written in Python under MIT. afrog has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, Raccoon 12%. afrog was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| afrog | Raccoon | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 4.4K | ★ 4.0K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | HTML | Python |
| Last push | 2026-09-18 | 2026-04-21 |
| Forks | ⑂ 484 | ⑂ 501 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick afrog if
- You weight community size — 4.4K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches HTML
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Raccoon if
- You want the Raccoon feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and Raccoon fits your workflow better
About afrog
afrog is an MIT licensed vulnerability scanner built for bug bounty, penetration testing and red teaming, aimed at testers who need fast verification of web targets and network services with low false positives.
read the full afrog overview →
About Raccoon
Raccoon is an open source, MIT licensed offensive security tool written in Python for reconnaissance and information gathering, built for penetration testers, bug bounty hunters, and security analysts who need to map a target's DNS, TLS, network, and web footprint from a single command line.
read the full Raccoon overview →
More in Security & Privacy
Related comparisons
More Threat Detection & Response projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Threat Detection & Response field.
Frequently asked questions
Is afrog or Raccoon more popular?
afrog has 4,418 GitHub stars and Raccoon has 4,027. afrog has the larger community by that measure.
Are afrog and Raccoon free?
Both are open source. afrog is licensed under MIT and Raccoon under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between afrog and Raccoon?
afrog is written in HTML and Raccoon in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, afrog or Raccoon?
Choose afrog if you want the larger community (4,418 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Raccoon if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.