head to head · open source

Gitea vs zeroshot

Gitea has 58,284 GitHub stars, 7,214 forks, 2,455 open issues and last shipped yesterday. zeroshot has 1,919 stars, 180 forks, 3 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Gitea leads on adoption by 2,937% (58,284 vs 1,919 stars). Gitea is written in Go under MIT; zeroshot is written in Rust under MIT. Gitea has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, zeroshot 9%. Gitea was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Gitea ★ 58K zeroshot ★ 1.9K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Gitea zeroshot
GitHub stars ★ 58K ★ 1.9K
License MIT MIT
Written in Go Rust
Last push 2026-10-03 2026-10-03
Forks ⑂ 7.2K ⑂ 180
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Gitea if

  • You weight community size — 58K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Gitea profile →

pick zeroshot if

  • You want the zeroshot feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and zeroshot fits your workflow better

full zeroshot profile →

About Gitea

Gitea is a self hosted, all in one software development service written in Go. It provides Git hosting, code review, issue tracking, project management (kanban), wiki, team collaboration, package registry, and CI/CD capabilities. The project aims to deliver a lightweight, painless alternative to larger platforms by running as a single binary across Linux, macOS, FreeBSD, OpenBSD, and Windows on multiple architectures.

read the full Gitea overview →

About zeroshot

Zeroshot is an open source, MIT licensed Rust CLI that orchestrates coding agents as an explicit review graph for developers who want AI written changes verified by agents other than the one that wrote them.

read the full zeroshot overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 272K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 212K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K pi ★ 112K

Related comparisons

gitea vs gogs gitea vs open-code-review gitea vs code-review-graph gitea vs reflex gitea vs gitlab gitea vs gitbutler codegraph vs code-review-graph gogs vs open-code-review openclaw vs langflow ecc vs react ecc vs langflow react vs langflow ecc vs supabase react vs supabase n8n vs langflow ecc vs puppeteer openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip

More Version Control & Collaboration projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Version Control & Collaboration field.

Gitea vs Gogs Gitea vs open-code-review Gitea vs code-review-graph Gitea vs Reflex Gitea vs GitLab Gitea vs GitButler Gitea vs Coder Gitea vs gitpod Gitea vs pr-agent Gitea vs Encore Gitea vs reviewdog Gitea vs hunk

Frequently asked questions

Is Gitea or zeroshot more popular?

Gitea has 58,284 GitHub stars and zeroshot has 1,919. Gitea has the larger community by that measure.

Are Gitea and zeroshot free?

Both are open source. Gitea is licensed under MIT and zeroshot under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Gitea and zeroshot?

Gitea is written in Go and zeroshot in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Gitea or zeroshot?

Choose Gitea if you want the larger community (58,284 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose zeroshot if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.