head to head · open source

Gitea vs hunk

Gitea has 58,048 GitHub stars, 7,153 forks, 2,455 open issues and last shipped yesterday. hunk has 9,323 stars, 300 forks, 162 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. Gitea leads on adoption by 523% (58,048 vs 9,323 stars). Gitea is written in Go under MIT; hunk is written in TypeScript under MIT. Gitea has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, hunk 3%. Gitea was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (git), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Gitea ★ 58K hunk ★ 9.3K category Developer Tools

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Gitea hunk
GitHub stars ★ 58K ★ 9.3K
License MIT MIT
Written in Go TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-14
Forks ⑂ 7.2K ⑂ 300
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Gitea if

  • You weight community size — 58K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Gitea profile →

pick hunk if

  • You want the hunk feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and hunk fits your workflow better

full hunk profile →

About Gitea

Gitea is a self hosted, all in one software development service written in Go. It provides Git hosting, code review, issue tracking, project management (kanban), wiki, team collaboration, package registry, and CI/CD capabilities. The project aims to deliver a lightweight, painless alternative to larger platforms by running as a single binary across Linux, macOS, FreeBSD, OpenBSD, and Windows on multiple architectures.

read the full Gitea overview →

About hunk

hunk is a review first terminal diff viewer for agentic coders: an MIT licensed TypeScript tool that opens agent authored changesets in an interactive terminal review interface instead of raw patch text, aimed at developers who must inspect changes produced by AI coding agents or by collaborators.

read the full hunk overview →

More in Developer Tools

OpenCode ★ 208K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K fastapi ★ 102K Neovim ★ 102K

Related comparisons

gitea vs gogs gitea vs code-review-graph gitea vs open-code-review gitea vs reflex gitea vs gitlab gitea vs gitbutler gogs vs code-review-graph gogs vs open-code-review opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip opencode vs orca opencode vs cline opencode vs aider opencode vs continue opencode vs tabby opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed langflow vs neovim langflow vs zed opencode vs kilocode opencode vs codeedit neovim vs zed langflow vs kilocode

More Version Control & Collaboration projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Version Control & Collaboration field.

Gitea vs Gogs Gitea vs open-code-review Gitea vs code-review-graph Gitea vs Reflex Gitea vs GitLab Gitea vs GitButler Gitea vs Coder Gitea vs gitpod Gitea vs pr-agent Gitea vs Encore Gitea vs reviewdog Gitea vs plannotator

Frequently asked questions

Is Gitea or hunk more popular?

Gitea has 58,048 GitHub stars and hunk has 9,323. Gitea has the larger community by that measure.

Are Gitea and hunk free?

Both are open source. Gitea is licensed under MIT and hunk under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Gitea and hunk?

Gitea is written in Go and hunk in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Gitea or hunk?

Choose Gitea if you want the larger community (58,048 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose hunk if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.