head to head · open source
Uptime Kuma vs voltagent
Uptime Kuma has 91,578 GitHub stars, 8,441 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped today. voltagent has 10,647 stars, 1,135 forks, 86 open issues and last shipped 24 days ago. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 760% (91,578 vs 10,647 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; voltagent is written in TypeScript under MIT. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, voltagent 11%. Uptime Kuma was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Uptime Kuma | voltagent | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 92K | ★ 11K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | JavaScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-09-20 | 2026-08-27 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.4K | ⑂ 1.1K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Uptime Kuma if
- You weight community size — 92K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick voltagent if
- You want the voltagent feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and voltagent fits your workflow better
About Uptime Kuma
Uptime Kuma is a free, MIT licensed, self hosted monitoring tool with a reactive web dashboard, built for operators and teams that want to watch their own HTTP, TCP, and DNS endpoints and keep the resulting data on their own infrastructure.
read the full Uptime Kuma overview →
About voltagent
VoltAgent is an end to end AI Agent Engineering Platform built around an open source TypeScript framework. It lives in the JavaScript and TypeScript ecosystem, distributed through npm packages such as @voltagent/core and @voltagent/mcp docs server , and it is released under the MIT license. The project is roughly one year old, carries 10,619 stars and 1,126 forks on GitHub, and its most recent push landed on 27 August 2026. The platform has two halves: the open source framework, which supplies memory, RAG, guardrails, tools, MCP, voice, and workflow primitives, and the VoltOps Console, which is offered as either …
read the full voltagent overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Uptime Kuma or voltagent more popular?
Uptime Kuma has 91,578 GitHub stars and voltagent has 10,647. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.
Are Uptime Kuma and voltagent free?
Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT and voltagent under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and voltagent?
Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and voltagent in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or voltagent?
Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (91,578 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose voltagent if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.