head to head · open source
vaultwarden vs Infisical
vaultwarden has 70,236 GitHub stars, 3,413 forks, 83 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Infisical has 30,273 stars, 2,415 forks, 789 open issues and last shipped yesterday. vaultwarden leads on adoption by 132% (70,236 vs 30,273 stars). vaultwarden is written in Rust under AGPL-3.0; Infisical is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence. vaultwarden has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, Infisical 8%. Infisical was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| vaultwarden | Infisical | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 70K | ★ 30K |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Custom / other |
| Written in | Rust | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-04 | 2026-11-04 |
| Forks | ⑂ 3.4K | ⑂ 2.4K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick vaultwarden if
- You weight community size — 70K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Rust
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Infisical if
- You want the Infisical feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and Infisical fits your workflow better
About vaultwarden
An alternative server implementation of the Bitwarden Client API, written in Rust and compatible with official Bitwarden clients [disclaimer], perfect for self hosted deployment where running the official resource heavy service might not be ideal. %3D'svg'%5D%2F %5Blocal name()%3D'g'%5D%5B2%5D%2F %5Blocal name()%3D'text'%5D%5B4%5D&style=flat square&logo=rust&label=dependencies&color=005AA4) [!IMPORTANT] When using this server, please report any bugs or suggestions directly to us (see Get in touch), regardless of whatever clients you are using (mobile, desktop, browser...). DO NOT use the official Bitwarden…
read the full vaultwarden overview →
About Infisical
The open source secret management platform : Sync secrets/configs across your team/infrastructure and prevent secret leaks. Slack Infisical Cloud Self Hosting Docs Website Twitter Hiring (Remote/SF) Introduction Infisical is the open source security infrastructure platform that teams use for secrets, certificates, and privileged access management. We're on a mission to make security tooling more accessible to everyone, not just security teams, and that means redesigning the entire developer experience from ground up. Features Secrets Management: Centralize your application secrets and configuration across every…
read the full Infisical overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More Password & Secret Management projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Password & Secret Management field.
Frequently asked questions
Is vaultwarden or Infisical more popular?
vaultwarden has 70,236 GitHub stars and Infisical has 30,273. vaultwarden has the larger community by that measure.
Are vaultwarden and Infisical free?
Both are open source. vaultwarden is licensed under AGPL-3.0, and Infisical has no licence declared in this registry. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between vaultwarden and Infisical?
vaultwarden is written in Rust and Infisical in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, vaultwarden or Infisical?
Choose vaultwarden if you want the larger community (70,236 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Infisical if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.