head to head · open source

Uptime Kuma vs zabbix-docker

Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars, 8,655 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped yesterday. zabbix-docker has 2,857 stars, 1,435 forks, 7 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 3,162% (93,190 vs 2,857 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; zabbix-docker is written in Dockerfile under AGPL-3.0. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, zabbix-docker 50%. Uptime Kuma was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (docker, monitoring), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Uptime Kuma ★ 93K zabbix-docker ★ 2.9K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Uptime Kuma zabbix-docker
GitHub stars ★ 93K ★ 2.9K
License MIT AGPL-3.0
Written in JavaScript Dockerfile
Last push 2026-11-02 2026-11-02
Forks ⑂ 8.7K ⑂ 1.4K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Uptime Kuma if

  • You weight community size — 93K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Uptime Kuma profile →

pick zabbix-docker if

  • You want the zabbix-docker feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Dockerfile
  • You evaluated both and zabbix-docker fits your workflow better

full zabbix-docker profile →

About Uptime Kuma

Uptime Kuma Uptime Kuma is an easy to use self hosted monitoring tool. 🥔 Live Demo Try it! Demo Server (Location: Frankfurt Germany): It is a temporary live demo, all data will be deleted after 10 minutes. Sponsored by Uptime Kuma Sponsors. ⭐ Features Monitoring uptime for HTTP(s) / TCP / HTTP(s) Keyword / HTTP(s) Json Query / Websocket / Ping / DNS Record / Push / Steam Game Server / Docker Containers Fancy, Reactive, Fast UI/UX Notifications via Telegram, Discord, Gotify, Slack, Pushover, Email (SMTP), and 90+ notification services, click here for the full list 20 second intervals Multi Languages Multiple…

read the full Uptime Kuma overview →

About zabbix-docker

What is Zabbix? Zabbix is an enterprise class open source distributed monitoring solution. Zabbix is software that monitors numerous parameters of a network and the health and integrity of servers. Zabbix uses a flexible notification mechanism that allows users to configure e mail based alerts for virtually any event. This allows a fast reaction to server problems. Zabbix offers excellent reporting and data visualisation features based on the stored data. This makes Zabbix ideal for capacity planning. For more information and related downloads for Zabbix components, please visit and Zabbix Dockerfiles This…

read the full zabbix-docker overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Related comparisons

More Monitoring & Observability projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.

Frequently asked questions

Is Uptime Kuma or zabbix-docker more popular?

Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars and zabbix-docker has 2,857. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.

Are Uptime Kuma and zabbix-docker free?

Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT and zabbix-docker under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and zabbix-docker?

Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and zabbix-docker in Dockerfile. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or zabbix-docker?

Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (93,190 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose zabbix-docker if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.