head to head · open source
Uptime Kuma vs tslog
Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars, 8,655 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped yesterday. tslog has 1,753 stars, 74 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 5,216% (93,190 vs 1,753 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; tslog is written in TypeScript under MIT. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, tslog 4%. Uptime Kuma was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Uptime Kuma | tslog | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 93K | ★ 1.8K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | JavaScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-30 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.7K | ⑂ 74 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Uptime Kuma if
- You weight community size — 93K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick tslog if
- You want the tslog feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and tslog fits your workflow better
About Uptime Kuma
Uptime Kuma Uptime Kuma is an easy to use self hosted monitoring tool. 🥔 Live Demo Try it! Demo Server (Location: Frankfurt Germany): It is a temporary live demo, all data will be deleted after 10 minutes. Sponsored by Uptime Kuma Sponsors. ⭐ Features Monitoring uptime for HTTP(s) / TCP / HTTP(s) Keyword / HTTP(s) Json Query / Websocket / Ping / DNS Record / Push / Steam Game Server / Docker Containers Fancy, Reactive, Fast UI/UX Notifications via Telegram, Discord, Gotify, Slack, Pushover, Email (SMTP), and 90+ notification services, click here for the full list 20 second intervals Multi Languages Multiple…
read the full Uptime Kuma overview →
About tslog
Beautiful logging experience for TypeScript Powerful, fast and expressive logging for TypeScript and JavaScript [!NOTE] This is tslog v5. It is a deliberate, breaking redesign — ESM only, grouped settings, a new fields first JSON shape, and middleware instead of overwrite. . If you are on the 4.x line, 4.11.0 is a safe place to stay — most of the v5 performance wins were back ported there with zero breaking changes. Upgrade when you want the new capabilities. See Upgrading from v4? . Highlights 🏗 Universal — one logger for Node.js, browser, Deno, Bun, workers and React Native 🧱 Structured, fields first JSON —…
read the full tslog overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Uptime Kuma or tslog more popular?
Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars and tslog has 1,753. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.
Are Uptime Kuma and tslog free?
Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT and tslog under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and tslog?
Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and tslog in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or tslog?
Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (93,190 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose tslog if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.