head to head · open source

Uptime Kuma vs transmittable-thread-local

Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars, 8,655 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped yesterday. transmittable-thread-local has 8,305 stars, 1,721 forks, 57 open issues and last shipped 5 months ago. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 1,022% (93,190 vs 8,305 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; transmittable-thread-local is written in Java under Apache-2.0. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, transmittable-thread-local 21%. Uptime Kuma was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Uptime Kuma ★ 93K transmittable-thread-local ★ 8.3K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Uptime Kuma transmittable-thread-local
GitHub stars ★ 93K ★ 8.3K
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in JavaScript Java
Last push 2026-11-02 2026-06-18
Forks ⑂ 8.7K ⑂ 1.7K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Uptime Kuma if

  • You weight community size — 93K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Uptime Kuma profile →

pick transmittable-thread-local if

  • You want the transmittable-thread-local feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You evaluated both and transmittable-thread-local fits your workflow better

full transmittable-thread-local profile →

About Uptime Kuma

Uptime Kuma Uptime Kuma is an easy to use self hosted monitoring tool. 🥔 Live Demo Try it! Demo Server (Location: Frankfurt Germany): It is a temporary live demo, all data will be deleted after 10 minutes. Sponsored by Uptime Kuma Sponsors. ⭐ Features Monitoring uptime for HTTP(s) / TCP / HTTP(s) Keyword / HTTP(s) Json Query / Websocket / Ping / DNS Record / Push / Steam Game Server / Docker Containers Fancy, Reactive, Fast UI/UX Notifications via Telegram, Discord, Gotify, Slack, Pushover, Email (SMTP), and 90+ notification services, click here for the full list 20 second intervals Multi Languages Multiple…

read the full Uptime Kuma overview →

About transmittable-thread-local

[!IMPORTANT] 🚧 这个分支是 TransmittableThreadLocal(TTL) v3 ,在开发中还没有发布。 v3 的版本说明、工作项列表及其进展,参见 issue 432。 👉 目前使用中的稳定发布版本 v2.x 在 分支 2.x 上。 📖 English Documentation 📖 中文文档 🔧 功能 🎨 需求场景 👥 User Guide 1. 简单使用 2. 保证线程池中传递值 2.1 修饰 Runnable 和 Callable 整个过程的完整时序图 2.2 修饰线程池 2.3 使用 Java Agent 来修饰 JDK 线程池实现类 Java Agent 的启动参数配置 🔌 Java API Docs 🍪 Maven依赖 🔨 关于编译构建 ❓ FAQ ✨ 使用 TTL 的好处与必要性 🗿 更多文档 📚 相关资料 JDK Core Classes 💗 Who Used 👷 Contributors 🔧 功能 👉 TransmittableThreadLocal ( TTL ):在使用线程池等会池化复用线程的执行组件情况下,提供 ThreadLocal 值的传递功能,解决异步执行时上下文传递的问题。一个 Java 标准库本应为框架/中间件设施开发提供的标配能力,本库功能聚焦 & 0依赖,支持 Java 6 21 。 JDK 的…

read the full transmittable-thread-local overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Related comparisons

More Monitoring & Observability projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.

Frequently asked questions

Is Uptime Kuma or transmittable-thread-local more popular?

Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars and transmittable-thread-local has 8,305. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.

Are Uptime Kuma and transmittable-thread-local free?

Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT and transmittable-thread-local under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and transmittable-thread-local?

Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and transmittable-thread-local in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or transmittable-thread-local?

Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (93,190 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose transmittable-thread-local if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.