head to head · open source
Uptime Kuma vs tracing
Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars, 8,655 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped yesterday. tracing has 6,950 stars, 959 forks, 887 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 1,241% (93,190 vs 6,950 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; tracing is written in Rust under MIT. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, tracing 14%. Uptime Kuma was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Uptime Kuma | tracing | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 93K | ★ 7.0K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | JavaScript | Rust |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-29 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.7K | ⑂ 959 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Uptime Kuma if
- You weight community size — 93K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick tracing if
- You want the tracing feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Rust
- You evaluated both and tracing fits your workflow better
About Uptime Kuma
Uptime Kuma Uptime Kuma is an easy to use self hosted monitoring tool. 🥔 Live Demo Try it! Demo Server (Location: Frankfurt Germany): It is a temporary live demo, all data will be deleted after 10 minutes. Sponsored by Uptime Kuma Sponsors. ⭐ Features Monitoring uptime for HTTP(s) / TCP / HTTP(s) Keyword / HTTP(s) Json Query / Websocket / Ping / DNS Record / Push / Steam Game Server / Docker Containers Fancy, Reactive, Fast UI/UX Notifications via Telegram, Discord, Gotify, Slack, Pushover, Email (SMTP), and 90+ notification services, click here for the full list 20 second intervals Multi Languages Multiple…
read the full Uptime Kuma overview →
About tracing
![Tracing — Structured, application level diagnostics][splash] [splash]: [![Crates.io][crates badge]][crates url] [![Documentation][docs badge]][docs url] [![Documentation (v0.2.x)][docs v0.2.x badge]][docs v0.2.x url] [![MIT licensed][mit badge]][mit url] [![Build Status][actions badge]][actions url] [![Discord chat][discord badge]][discord url] [crates badge]: [crates url]: [docs badge]: [docs url]: [docs v0.2.x badge]: [docs v0.2.x url]: [mit badge]: [mit url]: LICENSE [actions badge]: [actions url]: [discord badge]: [discord url]: Website Chat Overview tracing is a framework for instrumenting Rust programs…
read the full tracing overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Uptime Kuma or tracing more popular?
Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars and tracing has 6,950. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.
Are Uptime Kuma and tracing free?
Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT and tracing under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and tracing?
Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and tracing in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or tracing?
Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (93,190 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose tracing if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.