head to head · open source
Uptime Kuma vs TokenTracker
Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars, 8,655 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped yesterday. TokenTracker has 2,177 stars, 225 forks, 34 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 4,181% (93,190 vs 2,177 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; TokenTracker is written in JavaScript under MIT. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, TokenTracker 10%. Uptime Kuma was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Uptime Kuma | TokenTracker | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 93K | ★ 2.2K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | JavaScript | JavaScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.7K | ⑂ 225 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Uptime Kuma if
- You weight community size — 93K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick TokenTracker if
- You want the TokenTracker feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You evaluated both and TokenTracker fits your workflow better
About Uptime Kuma
Uptime Kuma Uptime Kuma is an easy to use self hosted monitoring tool. 🥔 Live Demo Try it! Demo Server (Location: Frankfurt Germany): It is a temporary live demo, all data will be deleted after 10 minutes. Sponsored by Uptime Kuma Sponsors. ⭐ Features Monitoring uptime for HTTP(s) / TCP / HTTP(s) Keyword / HTTP(s) Json Query / Websocket / Ping / DNS Record / Push / Steam Game Server / Docker Containers Fancy, Reactive, Fast UI/UX Notifications via Telegram, Discord, Gotify, Slack, Pushover, Email (SMTP), and 90+ notification services, click here for the full list 20 second intervals Multi Languages Multiple…
read the full Uptime Kuma overview →
About TokenTracker
Token Tracker English · 简体中文 · 日本語 · 한국어 · Deutsch Track every AI token — then bring your usage to life An accurate, local first token usage and cost dashboard for 39 AI coding tools — plus a desktop pet, 4 native widgets , and 15 achievement tracks . No cloud account, no API keys, no setup. 📊 See the token dashboard in action 🐾 A living desktop companion Codes, celebrates streaks, follows your cursor, and rests when you do. 🧩 Four native widgets Usage, activity heatmap, top models, and rate limits at a glance. 🏆 Unlock achievements from the way you actually code. 🎬 Meet TokenTracker ⭐ If TokenTracker saves…
read the full TokenTracker overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Uptime Kuma or TokenTracker more popular?
Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars and TokenTracker has 2,177. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.
Are Uptime Kuma and TokenTracker free?
Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT and TokenTracker under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and TokenTracker?
Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and TokenTracker in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or TokenTracker?
Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (93,190 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose TokenTracker if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.