head to head · open source
Uptime Kuma vs TokenTracker
Uptime Kuma has 91,498 GitHub stars, 8,431 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped yesterday. TokenTracker has 1,659 stars, 172 forks, 34 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 5,415% (91,498 vs 1,659 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; TokenTracker is written in JavaScript under MIT. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, TokenTracker 10%. Uptime Kuma was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 13541 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Uptime Kuma | TokenTracker | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 91K | ★ 1.7K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | JavaScript | JavaScript |
| Last push | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-16 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.4K | ⑂ 172 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Uptime Kuma if
- You weight community size — 91K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick TokenTracker if
- You want the TokenTracker feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You evaluated both and TokenTracker fits your workflow better
About Uptime Kuma
Uptime Kuma is a free, MIT licensed, self hosted monitoring tool with a reactive web dashboard, built for operators and teams that want to watch their own HTTP, TCP, and DNS endpoints and keep the resulting data on their own infrastructure.
read the full Uptime Kuma overview →
About TokenTracker
TokenTracker is a local first AI token usage and cost tracker for AI coding tools such as Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Gemini, and the DeepSeek Harness, delivered as a CLI, a local web dashboard, and native desktop apps for macOS, Windows, and Linux.
read the full TokenTracker overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Uptime Kuma or TokenTracker more popular?
Uptime Kuma has 91,498 GitHub stars and TokenTracker has 1,659. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.
Are Uptime Kuma and TokenTracker free?
Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT and TokenTracker under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and TokenTracker?
Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and TokenTracker in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or TokenTracker?
Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (91,498 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose TokenTracker if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.