head to head · open source
Uptime Kuma vs telegraf
Uptime Kuma has 91,477 GitHub stars, 8,426 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped yesterday. telegraf has 17,807 stars, 5,839 forks, 449 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 414% (91,477 vs 17,807 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; telegraf is written in Go under MIT. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, telegraf 33%. Uptime Kuma was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (monitoring), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Uptime Kuma | telegraf | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 91K | ★ 18K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | JavaScript | Go |
| Last push | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-17 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.4K | ⑂ 5.8K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Uptime Kuma if
- You weight community size — 91K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick telegraf if
- You want the telegraf feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and telegraf fits your workflow better
About Uptime Kuma
Uptime Kuma is a free, MIT licensed, self hosted monitoring tool with a reactive web dashboard, built for operators and teams that want to watch their own HTTP, TCP, and DNS endpoints and keep the resulting data on their own infrastructure.
read the full Uptime Kuma overview →
About telegraf
Telegraf is a Go based, MIT licensed open source agent that collects, processes, aggregates, and writes metrics, logs, and other arbitrary data, and it is aimed at engineers who run their own monitoring and observability pipelines.
read the full telegraf overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Uptime Kuma or telegraf more popular?
Uptime Kuma has 91,477 GitHub stars and telegraf has 17,807. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.
Are Uptime Kuma and telegraf free?
Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT and telegraf under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and telegraf?
Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and telegraf in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or telegraf?
Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (91,477 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose telegraf if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.