head to head · open source
Uptime Kuma vs talker
Uptime Kuma has 91,498 GitHub stars, 8,431 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped yesterday. talker has 845 stars, 123 forks, 92 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 10,728% (91,498 vs 845 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; talker is written in Dart under MIT. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, talker 15%. Uptime Kuma was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (monitoring), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 13541 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Uptime Kuma | talker | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 91K | ★ 845 |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | JavaScript | Dart |
| Last push | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-16 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.4K | ⑂ 123 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Uptime Kuma if
- You weight community size — 91K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick talker if
- You want the talker feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Dart
- You evaluated both and talker fits your workflow better
About Uptime Kuma
Uptime Kuma is a free, MIT licensed, self hosted monitoring tool with a reactive web dashboard, built for operators and teams that want to watch their own HTTP, TCP, and DNS endpoints and keep the resulting data on their own infrastructure.
read the full Uptime Kuma overview →
About talker
Talker is an open source error handler and logger for Dart and Flutter applications, aimed at developers who need to understand where a failure occurred in the shortest possible time.
read the full talker overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Uptime Kuma or talker more popular?
Uptime Kuma has 91,498 GitHub stars and talker has 845. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.
Are Uptime Kuma and talker free?
Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT and talker under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and talker?
Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and talker in Dart. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or talker?
Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (91,498 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose talker if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.