head to head · open source

Uptime Kuma vs talker

Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars, 8,655 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped yesterday. talker has 846 stars, 126 forks, 92 open issues and last shipped 6 days ago. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 10,915% (93,190 vs 846 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; talker is written in Dart under MIT. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, talker 15%. Uptime Kuma was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Uptime Kuma ★ 93K talker ★ 846 category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Uptime Kuma talker
GitHub stars ★ 93K ★ 846
License MIT MIT
Written in JavaScript Dart
Last push 2026-11-02 2026-10-28
Forks ⑂ 8.7K ⑂ 126
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Uptime Kuma if

  • You weight community size — 93K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Uptime Kuma profile →

pick talker if

  • You want the talker feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Dart
  • You evaluated both and talker fits your workflow better

full talker profile →

About Uptime Kuma

Uptime Kuma Uptime Kuma is an easy to use self hosted monitoring tool. 🥔 Live Demo Try it! Demo Server (Location: Frankfurt Germany): It is a temporary live demo, all data will be deleted after 10 minutes. Sponsored by Uptime Kuma Sponsors. ⭐ Features Monitoring uptime for HTTP(s) / TCP / HTTP(s) Keyword / HTTP(s) Json Query / Websocket / Ping / DNS Record / Push / Steam Game Server / Docker Containers Fancy, Reactive, Fast UI/UX Notifications via Telegram, Discord, Gotify, Slack, Pushover, Email (SMTP), and 90+ notification services, click here for the full list 20 second intervals Multi Languages Multiple…

read the full Uptime Kuma overview →

About talker

Advanced error handler and logger for dart and flutter apps Log your app actions, catch and handle exceptions and errors, show alerts and share log reports Show some ❤️ and star the repo to support the project! For better understanding how it works check Web Demo page Motivation 🚀 The main goal of the project is provide ability to understand where the error occurs in a shortest possible time ✅ Compatible with any state managements ✅ Works with any crash reporting tool (Firebase Crashlytics, Sentry, custom tools, etc.) ✅ Logs UI output of Flutter app on the screen ✅ Allows sharing and saving logs history and…

read the full talker overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Related comparisons

More Monitoring & Observability projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.

Frequently asked questions

Is Uptime Kuma or talker more popular?

Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars and talker has 846. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.

Are Uptime Kuma and talker free?

Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT and talker under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and talker?

Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and talker in Dart. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or talker?

Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (93,190 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose talker if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.