head to head · open source

Uptime Kuma vs SysmonTools

Uptime Kuma has 91,498 GitHub stars, 8,431 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped today. SysmonTools has 1,662 stars, 209 forks, 1 open issues and last shipped 6 months ago. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 5,405% (91,498 vs 1,662 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; SysmonTools is written in TypeScript under GPL-3.0. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, SysmonTools 13%. Uptime Kuma was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (monitoring), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Uptime Kuma ★ 91K SysmonTools ★ 1.7K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Uptime Kuma SysmonTools
GitHub stars ★ 91K ★ 1.7K
License MIT GPL-3.0
Written in JavaScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-04-04
Forks ⑂ 8.4K ⑂ 209
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Uptime Kuma if

  • You weight community size — 91K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Uptime Kuma profile →

pick SysmonTools if

  • You want the SysmonTools feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and SysmonTools fits your workflow better

full SysmonTools profile →

About Uptime Kuma

Uptime Kuma is a free, MIT licensed, self hosted monitoring tool with a reactive web dashboard, built for operators and teams that want to watch their own HTTP, TCP, and DNS endpoints and keep the resulting data on their own infrastructure.

read the full Uptime Kuma overview →

About SysmonTools

Sysmon Tools A collection of utilities for analyzing, visualizing, and managing Microsoft Sysmon logs — designed for security analysts, DFIR specialists, and threat hunters. What's New in v2.0 Sysmon View has been rewritten from the ground up as a fully open source desktop application — a long requested change by the community. Built with Electron + React + TypeScript , the entire codebase is now open and free of commercial dependencies. Key improvements: Modern dark themed UI with a streamlined analyst workflow Interactive session diagrams with freedom to move and arrange nodes Collapsible nodes — collapse/expan…

read the full SysmonTools overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K Grafana ★ 77K

Related comparisons

uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn uptime-kuma vs openvpn uptime-kuma vs wr-do uptime-kuma vs plakar uptime-kuma vs pluton worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb mall vs etcd mall vs dbeaver

More Monitoring & Observability projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.

Uptime Kuma vs worldmonitor Uptime Kuma vs NetData Uptime Kuma vs Grafana Uptime Kuma vs huginn Uptime Kuma vs Sentry Uptime Kuma vs SigNoz Uptime Kuma vs Grafana Loki Uptime Kuma vs beszel Uptime Kuma vs cilium Uptime Kuma vs Apache SkyWalking Uptime Kuma vs jaeger Uptime Kuma vs Vector

Frequently asked questions

Is Uptime Kuma or SysmonTools more popular?

Uptime Kuma has 91,498 GitHub stars and SysmonTools has 1,662. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.

Are Uptime Kuma and SysmonTools free?

Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT and SysmonTools under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and SysmonTools?

Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and SysmonTools in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or SysmonTools?

Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (91,498 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose SysmonTools if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.