head to head · open source
Uptime Kuma vs swift-log
Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars, 8,655 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped yesterday. swift-log has 4,056 stars, 351 forks, 26 open issues and last shipped 8 days ago. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 2,198% (93,190 vs 4,056 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; swift-log is written in Swift under Apache-2.0. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, swift-log 9%. Uptime Kuma was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Uptime Kuma | swift-log | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 93K | ★ 4.1K |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | JavaScript | Swift |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-26 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.7K | ⑂ 351 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Uptime Kuma if
- You weight community size — 93K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick swift-log if
- You want the swift-log feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Swift
- You evaluated both and swift-log fits your workflow better
About Uptime Kuma
Uptime Kuma Uptime Kuma is an easy to use self hosted monitoring tool. 🥔 Live Demo Try it! Demo Server (Location: Frankfurt Germany): It is a temporary live demo, all data will be deleted after 10 minutes. Sponsored by Uptime Kuma Sponsors. ⭐ Features Monitoring uptime for HTTP(s) / TCP / HTTP(s) Keyword / HTTP(s) Json Query / Websocket / Ping / DNS Record / Push / Steam Game Server / Docker Containers Fancy, Reactive, Fast UI/UX Notifications via Telegram, Discord, Gotify, Slack, Pushover, Email (SMTP), and 90+ notification services, click here for the full list 20 second intervals Multi Languages Multiple…
read the full Uptime Kuma overview →
About swift-log
SwiftLog This repository contains a logging API implementation for Swift. SwiftLog provides a unified, performant, and ergonomic logging API that can be adopted by libraries and applications across the Swift ecosystem. 📚 Documentation and tutorials are available on the Swift Package Index 🚀 Contributions are welcome, please see CONTRIBUTING.md 🪪 License is Apache 2.0, repeated in LICENSE.txt 🔒 Security issues should be reported via the process in Security 🔀 Available Logging Backends : SwiftLog is an API package you'll want to choose from the many community maintained logging backends for production use…
read the full swift-log overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Uptime Kuma or swift-log more popular?
Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars and swift-log has 4,056. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.
Are Uptime Kuma and swift-log free?
Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT and swift-log under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and swift-log?
Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and swift-log in Swift. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or swift-log?
Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (93,190 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose swift-log if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.