head to head · open source
Uptime Kuma vs swift-log
Uptime Kuma has 91,498 GitHub stars, 8,431 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped today. swift-log has 4,050 stars, 344 forks, 26 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 2,159% (91,498 vs 4,050 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; swift-log is written in Swift under Apache-2.0. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, swift-log 8%. Uptime Kuma was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Uptime Kuma | swift-log | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 91K | ★ 4.0K |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | JavaScript | Swift |
| Last push | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-17 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.4K | ⑂ 344 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Uptime Kuma if
- You weight community size — 91K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick swift-log if
- You want the swift-log feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Swift
- You evaluated both and swift-log fits your workflow better
About Uptime Kuma
Uptime Kuma is a free, MIT licensed, self hosted monitoring tool with a reactive web dashboard, built for operators and teams that want to watch their own HTTP, TCP, and DNS endpoints and keep the resulting data on their own infrastructure.
read the full Uptime Kuma overview →
About swift-log
SwiftLog This repository contains a logging API implementation for Swift. SwiftLog provides a unified, performant, and ergonomic logging API that can be adopted by libraries and applications across the Swift ecosystem. 📚 Documentation and tutorials are available on the Swift Package Index 🚀 Contributions are welcome, please see CONTRIBUTING.md 🪪 License is Apache 2.0, repeated in LICENSE.txt 🔒 Security issues should be reported via the process in Security 🔀 Available Logging Backends : SwiftLog is an API package you'll want to choose from the many community maintained logging backends for production use Quic…
read the full swift-log overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Uptime Kuma or swift-log more popular?
Uptime Kuma has 91,498 GitHub stars and swift-log has 4,050. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.
Are Uptime Kuma and swift-log free?
Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT and swift-log under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and swift-log?
Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and swift-log in Swift. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or swift-log?
Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (91,498 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose swift-log if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.