head to head · open source
Uptime Kuma vs StatusScout
Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars, 8,655 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped yesterday. StatusScout has 16 stars, 0 forks, 3 open issues and last shipped 5 months ago. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 582,338% (93,190 vs 16 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; StatusScout is written in JavaScript under a custom or non-standard licence. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, StatusScout 0%. Uptime Kuma was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (monitoring), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Uptime Kuma | StatusScout | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 93K | ★ 16 |
| License | MIT | Custom / other |
| Written in | JavaScript | JavaScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-05-23 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.7K | ⑂ 0 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Uptime Kuma if
- You weight community size — 93K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick StatusScout if
- You want the StatusScout feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You evaluated both and StatusScout fits your workflow better
About Uptime Kuma
Uptime Kuma Uptime Kuma is an easy to use self hosted monitoring tool. 🥔 Live Demo Try it! Demo Server (Location: Frankfurt Germany): It is a temporary live demo, all data will be deleted after 10 minutes. Sponsored by Uptime Kuma Sponsors. ⭐ Features Monitoring uptime for HTTP(s) / TCP / HTTP(s) Keyword / HTTP(s) Json Query / Websocket / Ping / DNS Record / Push / Steam Game Server / Docker Containers Fancy, Reactive, Fast UI/UX Notifications via Telegram, Discord, Gotify, Slack, Pushover, Email (SMTP), and 90+ notification services, click here for the full list 20 second intervals Multi Languages Multiple…
read the full Uptime Kuma overview →
About StatusScout
StatusScout StatusScout monitors security headers, SSL certificates, DNS records, exposed files, and more. You get an alert the moment something goes wrong. Self hosted, open source, free to run. Run a free scan (no signup): statusscout.dev What It Checks Security headers SSL/TLS certificate validity Exposed sensitive files & hidden paths DNS health Cookie security Mixed content Page security Exposed API docs Broken links Project Structure Getting Started Prerequisites Docker and docker compose Setup 1. Clone the repository: 2. Copy .env.dist to .env and fill in your secrets: 3. Start all services: 4. Open…
read the full StatusScout overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Uptime Kuma or StatusScout more popular?
Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars and StatusScout has 16. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.
Are Uptime Kuma and StatusScout free?
Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT, and StatusScout has no licence declared in this registry. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and StatusScout?
Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and StatusScout in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or StatusScout?
Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (93,190 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose StatusScout if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.