head to head · open source
Uptime Kuma vs StatusScout
Uptime Kuma has 91,477 GitHub stars, 8,426 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped yesterday. StatusScout has 15 stars, 2 forks, 3 open issues and last shipped 4 months ago. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 609,747% (91,477 vs 15 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; StatusScout is written in JavaScript under a custom or non-standard licence. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, StatusScout 13%. Uptime Kuma was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (monitoring), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Uptime Kuma | StatusScout | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 91K | ★ 15 |
| License | MIT | Custom / other |
| Written in | JavaScript | JavaScript |
| Last push | 2026-09-17 | 2026-05-23 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.4K | ⑂ 2 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Uptime Kuma if
- You weight community size — 91K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick StatusScout if
- You want the StatusScout feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You evaluated both and StatusScout fits your workflow better
About Uptime Kuma
Uptime Kuma is a free, MIT licensed, self hosted monitoring tool with a reactive web dashboard, built for operators and teams that want to watch their own HTTP, TCP, and DNS endpoints and keep the resulting data on their own infrastructure.
read the full Uptime Kuma overview →
About StatusScout
StatusScout is a self hosted, source available website health and security monitor that schedules checks on security headers, SSL/TLS certificates, DNS records, exposed files and related weaknesses and alerts when something breaks, built for developers, operators and small teams who want that coverage without handing scan data to a hosted service.
read the full StatusScout overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Uptime Kuma or StatusScout more popular?
Uptime Kuma has 91,477 GitHub stars and StatusScout has 15. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.
Are Uptime Kuma and StatusScout free?
Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT, and StatusScout has no licence declared in this registry. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and StatusScout?
Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and StatusScout in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or StatusScout?
Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (91,477 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose StatusScout if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.