head to head · open source
Uptime Kuma vs Statusnook
Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars, 8,655 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Statusnook has 988 stars, 32 forks, 12 open issues and last shipped 2.0 years ago. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 9,332% (93,190 vs 988 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; Statusnook is written in Go under MIT. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, Statusnook 3%. Uptime Kuma was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (monitoring, self-hosted), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Uptime Kuma | Statusnook | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 93K | ★ 988 |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | JavaScript | Go |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2024-10-31 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.7K | ⑂ 32 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Uptime Kuma if
- You weight community size — 93K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Statusnook if
- You want the Statusnook feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and Statusnook fits your workflow better
About Uptime Kuma
Uptime Kuma Uptime Kuma is an easy to use self hosted monitoring tool. 🥔 Live Demo Try it! Demo Server (Location: Frankfurt Germany): It is a temporary live demo, all data will be deleted after 10 minutes. Sponsored by Uptime Kuma Sponsors. ⭐ Features Monitoring uptime for HTTP(s) / TCP / HTTP(s) Keyword / HTTP(s) Json Query / Websocket / Ping / DNS Record / Push / Steam Game Server / Docker Containers Fancy, Reactive, Fast UI/UX Notifications via Telegram, Discord, Gotify, Slack, Pushover, Email (SMTP), and 90+ notification services, click here for the full list 20 second intervals Multi Languages Multiple…
read the full Uptime Kuma overview →
About Statusnook
Effortlessly deploy a status page and start monitoring endpoints in minutes Deployment paths Standalone Quickly deploy Statusnook with managed TLS. Requires ports 80 and 443 Reverse proxy Deploy Statusnook behind Caddy, NGINX, etc. Docker CLI compose.yaml One click cloud templates Binaries amd64 and arm64 Linux binaries can be found on the Releases page. Configuration Statusnook has the following configuration options: Web UI based config Text based config (YAML) via the settings page, or on push via GitHub Learn more about configuration Gallery
read the full Statusnook overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Uptime Kuma or Statusnook more popular?
Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars and Statusnook has 988. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.
Are Uptime Kuma and Statusnook free?
Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT and Statusnook under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and Statusnook?
Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and Statusnook in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or Statusnook?
Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (93,190 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Statusnook if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.