head to head · open source
Uptime Kuma vs Statusnook
Uptime Kuma has 91,477 GitHub stars, 8,426 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Statusnook has 982 stars, 31 forks, 12 open issues and last shipped 1.9 years ago. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 9,215% (91,477 vs 982 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; Statusnook is written in Go under MIT. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, Statusnook 3%. Uptime Kuma was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (monitoring, self-hosted), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Uptime Kuma | Statusnook | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 91K | ★ 982 |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | JavaScript | Go |
| Last push | 2026-09-17 | 2024-10-31 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.4K | ⑂ 31 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Uptime Kuma if
- You weight community size — 91K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Statusnook if
- You want the Statusnook feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and Statusnook fits your workflow better
About Uptime Kuma
Uptime Kuma is a free, MIT licensed, self hosted monitoring tool with a reactive web dashboard, built for operators and teams that want to watch their own HTTP, TCP, and DNS endpoints and keep the resulting data on their own infrastructure.
read the full Uptime Kuma overview →
About Statusnook
Statusnook is a self hosted, MIT licensed status page and endpoint monitoring tool written in Go, aimed at small teams and individual operators who want to publish service health on their own infrastructure rather than pay for a hosted status page.
read the full Statusnook overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Uptime Kuma or Statusnook more popular?
Uptime Kuma has 91,477 GitHub stars and Statusnook has 982. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.
Are Uptime Kuma and Statusnook free?
Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT and Statusnook under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and Statusnook?
Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and Statusnook in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or Statusnook?
Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (91,477 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Statusnook if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.