head to head · open source

Uptime Kuma vs statsviz

Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars, 8,655 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped yesterday. statsviz has 3,647 stars, 126 forks, 10 open issues and last shipped 6 days ago. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 2,455% (93,190 vs 3,647 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; statsviz is written in Go under MIT. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, statsviz 3%. Uptime Kuma was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (monitoring), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Uptime Kuma ★ 93K statsviz ★ 3.6K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Uptime Kuma statsviz
GitHub stars ★ 93K ★ 3.6K
License MIT MIT
Written in JavaScript Go
Last push 2026-11-02 2026-10-28
Forks ⑂ 8.7K ⑂ 126
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Uptime Kuma if

  • You weight community size — 93K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Uptime Kuma profile →

pick statsviz if

  • You want the statsviz feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and statsviz fits your workflow better

full statsviz profile →

About Uptime Kuma

Uptime Kuma Uptime Kuma is an easy to use self hosted monitoring tool. 🥔 Live Demo Try it! Demo Server (Location: Frankfurt Germany): It is a temporary live demo, all data will be deleted after 10 minutes. Sponsored by Uptime Kuma Sponsors. ⭐ Features Monitoring uptime for HTTP(s) / TCP / HTTP(s) Keyword / HTTP(s) Json Query / Websocket / Ping / DNS Record / Push / Steam Game Server / Docker Containers Fancy, Reactive, Fast UI/UX Notifications via Telegram, Discord, Gotify, Slack, Pushover, Email (SMTP), and 90+ notification services, click here for the full list 20 second intervals Multi Languages Multiple…

read the full Uptime Kuma overview →

About statsviz

Statsviz Visualize real time plots of your Go program runtime/metrics including heap, objects, goroutines, GC pauses, scheduler and more. Statsviz Install Usage Examples How Does That Work? Documentation Go API Web User Interface Plots User Plots Questions / Troubleshooting Contributing Changelog License: MIT Install Get the latest version: Usage Register Statsviz HTTP handlers with your application http.ServeMux . Open your browser at Examples If you check any of the boxes below: [ ] you use some HTTP framework [ ] you want Statsviz to be located at /my/path/to/statsviz rather than /debug/statsviz [ ] you want…

read the full statsviz overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Related comparisons

More Monitoring & Observability projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.

Frequently asked questions

Is Uptime Kuma or statsviz more popular?

Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars and statsviz has 3,647. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.

Are Uptime Kuma and statsviz free?

Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT and statsviz under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and statsviz?

Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and statsviz in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or statsviz?

Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (93,190 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose statsviz if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.